MILP Sensitivity Analysis for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch Plants under Uncertainty

2011 ◽  
Vol 181-182 ◽  
pp. 577-582
Author(s):  
Jin Zhu ◽  
Xiu Mei Zhang ◽  
Wei Kang

In this paper, An integrated framework is developed to handle uncertainty in short-term scheduling based on the idea of inference-based sensitivity analysis for MILP problems and the utilization of a branch and bound solution methodology. The proposed method leads to the determination of the importance of different parameters and the constraints on the objective function and the generation and evaluation of a set of alternative schedules given the variability of the uncertain parameters. The main advantage of the proposed method is that no substantial complexity is added compared with the solution of the deterministic case because the only additional required information is the dual information at the leaf nodes of the branch-and-bound tree. Two case studies are presented to highlight the information extracted by the proposed approach and the complexity involved compared with parametric programming studies.

Author(s):  
O. Yu. Atkov ◽  
S. G. Gorokhova

The individual dynamics of the allostatic load index was revealed mainly due to changes in the glucose level, body mass index, which makes it applicable for assessing the short-term adaptation to the stay in the conditions of shift work


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianglei Ma ◽  
Xiaoyao Li ◽  
Shifu Zhao ◽  
Jiawei Wang ◽  
Wujia Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It remains no clear conclusion about which is better between robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term and long-term efficacy between RATS and VATS for NSCLC. Methods Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Medline, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before December 2020. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Fixed or random effect models were applied according to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Results A total of 18 studies including 11,247 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 5114 patients were in the RATS group and 6133 in the VATS group. Compared with VATS, RATS was associated with less blood loss (WMD = − 50.40, 95% CI -90.32 ~ − 10.48, P = 0.010), lower conversion rate (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.43 ~ 0.60, P < 0.001), more harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 1.72, 95% CI 0.63 ~ 2.81, P = 0.002) and stations (WMD = 0.51, 95% CI 0.15 ~ 0.86, P = 0.005), shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (WMD = − 0.61, 95% CI -0.78 ~ − 0.44, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (WMD = − 1.12, 95% CI -1.58 ~ − 0.66, P < 0.001), lower overall complication rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 ~ 0.99, P = 0.020), lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 0.72, P < 0.001), and higher cost (WMD = 3909.87 USD, 95% CI 3706.90 ~ 4112.84, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between RATS and VATS in operative time, mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Sensitivity analysis showed that no significant differences were found between the two techniques in conversion rate, number of harvested lymph nodes and stations, and overall complication. Conclusions The results revealed that RATS is a feasible and safe technique compared with VATS in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of robotic surgery for NSCLC.


1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 2158-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghun-Deok Suh ◽  
Hong-Bae Lee ◽  
Song-Yop Hahn ◽  
Tae-Kyung Chung ◽  
Il-Han Park

Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Arenas Bautista ◽  
Duque-Gardeazabal Nicolas ◽  
Arboleda-Obando Pedro Felipe ◽  
Guadagnini Alberto ◽  
Riva Monica ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document