Finite Element Analysis on the Stress Intensity Factor under Combined Bending and Torsion Loading

2011 ◽  
Vol 462-463 ◽  
pp. 1325-1330
Author(s):  
Al Emran Ismail ◽  
Ahmad Kamal Ariffin ◽  
Shahrum Abdullah ◽  
Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali ◽  
M. Abdulrazzaq

The stress intensity factor (SIF) under the combined bending and torsion loading were studied using a finite element (FE) analysis ANSYS. A 20-node iso-parametric element was used to model the crack tip and the square-root singularity of stress/strain was employed by shifting the mid-side node to the ¼ position to the crack tip. Different crack geometries and loading ratios were used and due to the non-symmetrical analysis involved, a full FE model was developed and analyzed. Remotely applied bending and torsion moment were subjected to the FE model and the SIF were then calculated along the crack front under such loadings. The SIF calculated using the finite element analysis (FEA) was compared with those results obtained using an effective combined SIF method. According to the comparisons, the discrepancies were dependent on the normalized coordinate, x/h, the relative crack depth, a/D, the crack aspect ratio, a/b and the loading ratio, .

Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani

Abstract This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.


Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani

This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.


Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Coêlho ◽  
Antonio Silva ◽  
Marco Santos ◽  
Antonio Lima ◽  
Neilor Santos

The purpose of this research is to compare both British standard BS 7910 (2013) and American standard API 579/ASME FFS-1 (2016) stress intensity factor (SIF) solutions by considering a series of semielliptical surface cracks located in the external surface of a pressurized hollow cylinder in the axial direction. Finite element analysis was used as a comparison basis for both standards’ SIF results. The solution from the British standard provided consistent results compared to Finite Element (FE) results for crack depth not much higher than half the thickness in the deepest and surface-breaking points. Above those limits, the British standard’s solutions diverged quite a lot from the American standard, whose results followed FE values for every crack depth/thickness ratio tested with a maximum percentage difference of 1.83%.


2013 ◽  
Vol 785-786 ◽  
pp. 1151-1158
Author(s):  
Zhi Bin Zhu ◽  
Xiao Xiang Yang ◽  
Li Jing Chen ◽  
Nai Chang Lin ◽  
Zhi Tuo Wang ◽  
...  

Based on the viscoelastic material property of polyethylene pipe, software ANSYS was used to simulate and analyze the mechanical property of polyethylene pipe butt fusion joints with circumferential surface crack defects. The viscoelastic material creep parameters were characterized as Prony series and 1/4 node singular element was selected for meshing along the boundaries of the crack, then the stress intensity factor of polyethylene pipe butt fusion joints with circumferential surface crack was calculated under the uniform internal pressure. Through the finite element simulation, the result showed that polyethylene pipe were most likely to fracture failure when crack initiated. Thus the viscoelasticity of materials can be ignored when analyzing the stress intensity factor of circumferential surface cracks of polyethylene pipe. the main influencing factor of the circumferential crack defects was the ratio of the crack depth to the thickness of polyethylene pipe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document