scholarly journals Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Bleeding Meckel’s Diverticulum in Two Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-634
Author(s):  
Taro Sugiyama ◽  
Nobuhisa Matsuhashi ◽  
Takao Takahashi ◽  
Kazuya Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshida
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Meckel’S Diverticulum ◽  
Meckel's Diverticulum ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

scholarly journals Single incision laparoscopic surgery for Meckel's diverticulum in an adult

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (may26 1) ◽  
pp. bcr2014204869-bcr2014204869
Author(s):  
S. Rajendran ◽  
S. A. Naqi
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Meckel’S Diverticulum ◽  
Meckel's Diverticulum ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

scholarly journals Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for Meckel’s diverticulum

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunitaka Kuramoto ◽  
Osamu Nakahara ◽  
Yuto Maeda ◽  
Sayahito Kumamoto ◽  
Akira Tsuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Intestine ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Meckel’S Diverticulum ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Meckel's Diverticulum ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Pertinent Literature ◽  
Abnormal Accumulation

Abstract A 65-year-old male patient presented with a chief complaint of abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed slight intestinal dilation and obstruction of the upper right quadrant of the small intestine, while ectopic gastric mucosal scintigraphy revealed abnormal accumulation in agreement with the CT-identified structure. The cause of bowel obstruction was diagnosed as Meckel’s diverticulum; the patient was referred for surgery. A small laparotomy was performed with a 35-mm skin incision to the center of the navel. Once a lap disk was attached, a laparoscope was inserted to visualize the abdominal cavity. The small intestine that includes the structure was pulled out from the umbilicus to the outside of the peritoneal cavity and partially resected. On the pathological tissue findings, the patient was diagnosed with Meckel’s diverticulum. We report our experience with single-lap laparoscopic surgery for a case of intestinal obstruction caused by Meckel’s diverticulum and review pertinent literature.

Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) bei Patienten mit chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen (CED)

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
EJM Rijcken ◽  
R Mennigen ◽  
I Argyris ◽  
N Senninger ◽  
M Brüwer
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

scholarly journals A learning curve in using organ retractor for single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Right Colon Cancer

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document