scholarly journals Full mouth rehabilitation of a severely worn dentition using intraoral scanner and the CAD/CAM double scanning technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Se-Na Yoon ◽  
Jung-Suk Han ◽  
In-Sung Yeo ◽  
Hyung-In Yoon
2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ippei Hamanaka ◽  
Kota Isshi ◽  
Yutaka Takahashi
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz ◽  
Jonas Vogler ◽  
Alexander Schmidt ◽  
Peter Rehmann ◽  
Bernd Wöstmann

To measure the internal fit of the computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) crowns, a new scanner-based chairside approach was investigated in patients, and the results were compared to the established silicone replica technique and a digital laboratory replica method. Thirty full-coverage crown preparations were included. Based on a digital impression with an intraoral scanner (IOS, Trios 3), three CAD/CAM measurement copings (‘COM’, resin composite; ‘ZIR’, zirconium dioxide; ‘NPA’, non-precious alloy) were fabricated for each tooth preparation. The internal fit of the measurement copings was analyzed with three different evaluation methods: IOS-based digital approach (D-IOS), digital replica method with laboratory software (D-GOM), and conventional silicone replica technique (CV-SR). The congruence between the determined target parameter of the 80-µm cement space and the actual measured internal gap was investigated. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA (p-value < 0.05). No significant difference was determined between the three evaluation methods. However, significant differences were observed for the three coping materials (p-value < 0.05), the single measurement position (marginal, axial, and occlusal fit) (p-value < 0.05), and the interaction between the coping material and the measurement position (p-value < 0.05). COM revealed the smallest internal gap, followed by ZIR and NPA. Regardless of the coping material, the occlusal gap was higher than the axial and marginal gaps. Furthermore, only the internal gaps of the marginal area almost matched the target parameter of 80-µm for the cement space. D-IOS is effective for measuring internal fit of single crowns in different clinical settings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
Jung-Suk Han ◽  
Sung-Hun Kim ◽  
Hyung-In Yoon ◽  
In-Sung Luke Yeo

Author(s):  
Angelina Vlahova ◽  
Viktor Hadzhigaev ◽  
Christo Kissov ◽  
Rada Kazakova ◽  
Tanya Bozhkova

Introduction: The type of the preparation junction is determined by a number of factors that need to be taken in consideration with CAD/CAM Fixed Prosthodontics: the material of which the construction will be made; the type and condition of the retainer teeth, of their periodontium and the occlusion; the design software, the CAM setting and the type of drills; the working protocol; the type of the cement and the method of cementation.Purpose: The aim of this publication is to describe the optimal preparation junctions for all-ceramic crown and bridge restorations made by CAM 5 - S 2 Impression, VHF.Materials and methods: Suitable are chamfer and shoulder preparation junction with rounded inner angle (width 1 - 1, 5 mm). Trimming of 1.5 – 2 mm dental tissues is necessary on the occlusal surface. The homothetic reduction of teeth is optimal.Results and discussion: The width depends on the size and vitality of the tooth. In stained teeth and those built with metal pins the removal of more tissues provides a greater volume needed to disguise the dark color. Vestibular preparation under the level of the gingiva is preferable to ensure optimal aesthetics. Preparation junction is determined also by the CAD/CAM technology - the type of drills and protocol of impression taking (classical or digital). The creation of a working model with TRIOS, 3Shape intraoral scanner is greatly facilitated by preparation junctions made above the gingival margin.Conclusion: Knowledge about the criteria for selection the preparation junctions is essential for fabrication accurate and aesthetic CAD/CAM restorations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Virard ◽  
Laurent Venet ◽  
Raphaël Richert ◽  
Daniel Pfeffer ◽  
Gilbert Viguié ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document