scholarly journals Remark on our paper ``On bases in Banach spaces'' (Studia Math. 170 (2005), 147–171)

2009 ◽  
Vol 191 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
T. Bartoszyński ◽  
M. Džamonja ◽  
L. Halbeisen ◽  
E. Murtinová ◽  
A. Plichko
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
TROND A. ABRAHAMSEN ◽  
OLAV NYGAARD

AbstractWe define and study λ-strict ideals in Banach spaces, which for λ=1 means strict ideals. Strict u-ideals in their biduals are known to have the unique ideal property; we prove that so also do λ-strict u-ideals in their biduals, at least for λ>1/2. An open question, posed by Godefroy et al. [‘Unconditional ideals in Banach spaces’, Studia Math.104 (1993), 13–59] is whether the Banach space X is a u-ideal in Ba(X), the Baire-one functions in X**, exactly when κu(X)=1; we prove that if κu(X)=1 then X is a strict u-ideal in Ba (X) , and we establish the converse in the separable case.


Author(s):  
Radosław Łukasik

AbstractLet X be a Banach space. Fix a torsion-free commutative and cancellative semigroup S whose torsion-free rank is the same as the density of $$X^{**}$$ X ∗ ∗ . We then show that X is complemented in $$X^{**}$$ X ∗ ∗ if and only if there exists an invariant mean $$M:\ell _\infty (S,X)\rightarrow X$$ M : ℓ ∞ ( S , X ) → X . This improves upon previous results due to Bustos Domecq (J Math Anal Appl 275(2):512–520, 2002), Kania (J Math Anal Appl 445:797–802, 2017), Goucher and Kania (Studia Math 260:91–101, 2021).


2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moosa Gabeleh ◽  
Hans-Peter A. Künzi

AbstractIn this study, at first we prove that the existence of best proximity points for cyclic nonexpansive mappings is equivalent to the existence of best proximity pairs for noncyclic nonexpansive mappings in the setting of strictly convex Banach spaces by using the projection operator. In this way, we conclude that the main result of the paper [Proximal normal structure and nonexpansive mappings, Studia Math. 171 (2005), 283–293] immediately follows. We then discuss the convergence of best proximity pairs for noncyclic contractions by applying the convergence of iterative sequences for cyclic contractions and show that the convergence method of a recent paper [Convergence of Picard's iteration using projection algorithm for noncyclic contractions, Indag. Math. 30 (2019), no. 1, 227–239] is obtained exactly from Picard’s iteration sequence.


2014 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUNBAI DONG ◽  
BENTUO ZHENG

AbstractLet$(X,+)$be an Abelian group and$E$be a Banach space. Suppose that$f:X\rightarrow E$is a surjective map satisfying the inequality$$\begin{eqnarray}|\,\Vert f(x)-f(y)\Vert -\Vert f(x-y)\Vert \,|\leq {\it\varepsilon}\min \{\Vert f(x)-f(y)\Vert ^{p},\Vert f(x-y)\Vert ^{p}\}\end{eqnarray}$$for some${\it\varepsilon}>0$,$p>1$and for all$x,y\in X$. We prove that$f$is an additive map. However, this result does not hold for$0<p\leq 1$. As an application, we show that if$f$is a surjective map from a Banach space$E$onto a Banach space$F$so that for some${\it\epsilon}>0$and$p>1$$$\begin{eqnarray}|\,\Vert f(x)-f(y)\Vert -\Vert f(u)-f(v)\Vert \,|\leq {\it\epsilon}\min \{\Vert f(x)-f(y)\Vert ^{p},\Vert f(u)-f(v)\Vert ^{p}\}\end{eqnarray}$$whenever$\Vert x-y\Vert =\Vert u-v\Vert$, then$f$preserves equality of distance. Moreover, if$\dim E\geq 2$, there exists a constant$K\neq 0$such that$Kf$is an affine isometry. This improves a result of Vogt [‘Maps which preserve equality of distance’,Studia Math.45(1973) 43–48].


Author(s):  
Yemon Choi

Non-amenability of ${\mathcal {B}}(E)$ has been surprisingly difficult to prove for the classical Banach spaces, but is now known for E = ℓ p and E = L p for all 1 ⩽ p < ∞. However, the arguments are rather indirect: the proof for L1 goes via non-amenability of $\ell ^\infty ({\mathcal {K}}(\ell _1))$ and a transference principle developed by Daws and Runde (Studia Math., 2010). In this note, we provide a short proof that ${\mathcal {B}}(L_1)$ and some of its subalgebras are non-amenable, which completely bypasses all of this machinery. Our approach is based on classical properties of the ideal of representable operators on L1, and shows that ${\mathcal {B}}(L_1)$ is not even approximately amenable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document