scholarly journals Atypical Extraction of Maxillary Central Incisor for the Correction of Angle Class II Malocclusion

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-298
Author(s):  
Anderson Paulo Barbosa Lima ◽  
Graziela Oro Cericato ◽  
Matheus Melo Pithon ◽  
Ademir Franco ◽  
Alex Moreira Herval ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 140-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Newton Torres

The present case report addresses the treatment of an Angle Class II malocclusion in an adult female patient, long face pattern, with posterior open bite and dental arches extremely expanded, due to previous treatment. The patient and parents rejection to a treatment with orthognathic surgery led to orthodontic camouflage of the skeletal discrepancies. This clinical case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics (BBO) as one of the requirements to become a BBO Diplomate.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
Zilda Lúcia Valentim Assunção

The present study reports a case of Angle Class II malocclusion treatment of a male growing patient with 10-mm overjet, excessive overbite and transverse maxillary deficiency. The case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO), with DI equal to or greater than 10, as a requirement for the title of certified by the BBO.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
Sergiu-Alexandru Rădulescu ◽  
◽  
Andreea Paula Rădulescu ◽  
Florina Trîmbiţaş ◽  
Ecaterina Ionescu ◽  
...  

Objective. In this study we tried to notice the differences in the number and type of occlusal contacts present in patients with Angle Class I and Class-II malocclusions. Materials and methods. For this study were examined 30 patients with Angle Class I and Class-II malocclusions. Identification of the number and type of occlusal contacts was made both clinically and with the help of study casts mounted in an semiadjustable articulator. Results and discussion. In the Angle Class I malocclusion average total number of occlusal contacts was 36.93 and in Angle Class-II malocclusion was 31.46 contacts. Most occlusal contacts identified were side cusp – side fossa type. Following statistical analysis we did not fi nd significant differences between the two classes of malocclusions, in terms of total number of occlusal contacts. Conclusions. The total number of occlusal contacts does not differ depending on the malocclusion class, but there are differences between the number of contacts occurring within certain groups of posterior teeth. In order to have findings with practical application it is necessary to carry out more studies on the type and number of occlusal contacts that may occur in individuals with malocclusions.


2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Cozza ◽  
Alessandra Marino ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi

Abstract Malocclusions with a hyperdivergent vertical facial pattern are often difficult to treat without a combined surgical/orthodontic approach. The aim of this article is to describe a nonsurgical approach to the treatment of a high-angle Class II malocclusion in a growing patient. Some fundamental aspects, such as correct diagnosis, treatment timing, favorable mandibular growth pattern, and patient compliance, proved to be critical to correct the severe dentoskeletal disharmony.


2004 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D Batterson ◽  
Tod Curtis ◽  
Clay Parks ◽  
Erik Curtis ◽  
Chris Carlson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 126-133
Author(s):  
Gustavo Mattos Barreto

Angle Class II malocclusion associated with anterior open bite in adult patients demands a carefully elaborated orthodontic planning, aiming at restoring not only harmonious dental and facial esthetics, but also a balanced masticatory function. Orthognathic surgery or permanent teeth extraction are often the choice of treatment, therefore, treatment decision is related to all dental, skeletal and functional aspects. The present report discusses orthodontic compensation carried out by means of upper premolar extraction performed to correct the Class II canine relationship and, consequently, the anterior open bite, accepting that the upper incisors be retroclined. This clinical case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) as part of the requirements for obtaining the BBO Certification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document