Quantitative evaluation of masseter muscle volume in different growth patterns and its correlation with facial morphology: Cone beam computed tomography study

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Gupta ◽  
P G Makhija
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Quantitative Evaluation ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Masseter Muscle ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Muscle Volume ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Facial Morphology

Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Reis Lemes ◽  
Carolina Fernandes Tozzi ◽  
Saulo Gribel ◽  
Bruno Frazão Gribel ◽  
Giovana Cherubini Venezian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Mandibular Ramus ◽  
Ramus Height

Three-dimensional evaluation of pharyngeal airway in individuals with varying growth patterns using cone beam computed tomography

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Diwakar ◽  
Maninder Singh Sidhu ◽  
Mona Prabhakar ◽  
Seema Grover ◽  
Ritu Phogat
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Pharyngeal Airway

Three-dimensional evaluation of pharyngeal airway in individuals with varying growth patterns using cone beam computed tomography

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-88
Author(s):  
Rohan Diwakar ◽  
Maninder Singh Sidhu ◽  
Mona Prabhakar ◽  
Seema Grover ◽  
Ritu Phogat
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Pharyngeal Airway

scholarly journals Evaluation of the position and morphology of tongue and hyoid bone in skeletal Class II malocclusion based on cone beam computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wener Chen ◽  
HungEn Mou ◽  
Yufen Qian ◽  
Liwen Qian
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Hyoid Bone ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Average Angle

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to analyze the morphology and position of the tongue and hyoid bone in skeletal Class II patients with different vertical growth patterns by cone beam computed tomography in comparison to skeletal Class I patients. Methods Ninety subjects with malocclusion were divided into skeletal Class II and Class I groups by ANB angles. Based on different vertical growth patterns, subjects in each group were divided into 3 subgroups: high-angle group (MP-FH ≥ 32.0°), average-angle group (22.0° ≤ MP-FH < 32°) and low-angle group (MP-FH < 22°). The position and morphology of the tongue and hyoid bone were evaluated in the cone beam computed tomography images. The independent Student’s t‐test was used to compare the position and morphology of the tongue and hyoid bone between skeletal Class I and Class II groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the measurement indexes of different vertical facial patterns in each group. Results Patients in skeletal Class II group had lower tongue posture, and the tongue body was smaller than that of those in the Class I group (P < 0.05). The position of the hyoid bone was lower in the skeletal Class II group than in Class I group (P < 0.05). The tongue length and H-Me in the skeletal Class I group with a low angle were significantly larger than those with an average angle and high angle (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the position or morphology of the tongue and hyoid bone in the skeletal Class II group with different vertical facial patterns (P > 0.05). Conclusion Patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion have lower tongue posture, a smaller tongue body, and greater occurrence of posterior inferior hyoid bone position than skeletal Class I patients. The length of the mandibular body in skeletal Class I patients with a horizontal growth type is longer. The position and morphology of the tongue and hyoid bone were not greatly affected by vertical facial development in skeletal Class II patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document