scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of the regional micro-push-out bond strength of custom-made resin post system with a prefabricated resin post: An in vitro study

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 484 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ranjithkumar ◽  
N Velmurugan ◽  
Anna Roy ◽  
S Hemamalathi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of gutta-percha using different sealers with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized obturation technique: An in vitro study

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 593
Author(s):  
Naushad Ali ◽  
SuparnaGanguly Saha ◽  
Prashansa Vijayvargiya ◽  
Anuj Bhardwaj ◽  
Saurabh Shrivastava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals A comparative evaluation of the push-out bond strength of a resin-based sealer (AH Plus™) when two different intermediate irrigants are used, with and without a root canal brush: In vitro study

Endodontology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
ShaliniDevindernath Aggarwal ◽  
Ishan Ahmed ◽  
Anita Sanap ◽  
Vinay Rai ◽  
Swapnil Khadtare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals Micro Push-Out Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Dentin in Primary Dentition Using Three Universal Adhesives with Different pH: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 6349
Author(s):  
Regina María Del Río Carrillo ◽  
Pedro Molinero-Mourelle ◽  
Vicente Vera ◽  
Pablo Romero Villaba ◽  
Elizabeth Casañas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Primary Dentition ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Deciduous Tooth ◽  
Universal Adhesives ◽  
Type Of Failure ◽  
Push Out

To evaluate the bond strength of different universal adhesives on deciduous tooth dentineand their relationship with the composition and potential of hydrogen (pH). Methods: An in vitromicro push-out test on 150 samples (n = 50) per group per adhesive, namely, Adhese Universal(ADH; Ivoclar Vivadent), Futurabond U (FUT; Voco GmbH) (Test), and Scotchbond Universal withpre-conditioning (SCO; 3M) (Control), to record bond strength (BS) and type of adhesive failure.Results: The results of the different adhesives (megapascals (MPa)) varied, showing no statisticalsignificance. The corresponding averages are in MPa: ADH, 13.66 2.81; FUT, 14.48 2.88; SCO,14.98 3.96. Additionally, the frequency of type of failure was as follows: mixed (60.7%), adhesive(27.3%), and cohesive (12%). Conclusions: SCO, with a pH of 2.7, showed greater resistance tofracture, while FUT, with a pH of 2.3 and no pre-conditioning, approached the same values, being aone-step adhesive. No relationship was found between failure and type of adhesive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document