scholarly journals Correction of an adult Class II division 2 individual using fixed functional appliance: A noncompliance approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
NarayanH Gandedkar ◽  
Shrinivas Basavaraddi ◽  
Anup Belludi ◽  
Anand Patil
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Division 2

scholarly journals The British Orthodontic Society MOrth Cases Prize 2019

2021 ◽  
pp. 146531252098287
Author(s):  
Adam C Jowett
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
First Case ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Unerupted Teeth ◽  
Removable Appliance ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Lower Arch ◽  
First Permanent Molars

This paper describes the orthodontic treatment of two cases that were successful in winning the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) Membership in Orthodontics (MOrth) Cases Prize in 2019. The first case describes the management of a 12-year-old girl with a Class II division 2 malocclusion complicated by moderate upper and lower arch crowding, multiple unerupted teeth, restored lower first permanent molars, pseudo-transposition of the lower left lateral incisor and canine, and diminutive upper lateral incisors. Treatment involved a combination of an upper removable appliance followed by upper and lower preadjusted edgewise fixed appliances. Anteroposterior correction and overbite reduction was achieved with triangular Class II elastics with posterior occlusal disengagement. Both upper permanent canines were exposed and aligned, and the diminutive upper incisors built up with resin-based composite. Treatment was completed over a period of 23 months. The second case describes the management of a 13-year-old boy with a Class II division 2 malocclusion complicated by severe upper and lower arch crowding with unerupted UR5, UL4, LR3, rotated LR5, an increased overbite complete to tooth, buccally displaced upper canines and hypoplastic upper first premolars. Treatment involved a first phase of functional appliance therapy, followed by the extraction of UR4, UL4, LL5, LR4 and upper and lower preadjusted edgewise fixed appliances over a 28-month period.

scholarly journals Influence of Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs on Orthodontic Treatment Planning of Class II Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 296-302
Author(s):  
Irina Stupar ◽  
Enver Yetkiner ◽  
Daniel Wiedemeier ◽  
Thomas Attin ◽  
Rengin Attin
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Routine Manner ◽  
Knowing That ◽  
Signed Rank ◽  
Minor Influence ◽  
University Of Zurich

Background:Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs (LCR) are a common decision-making aid in orthodontic treatment planning and are routinely used in clinical practice. The aim of this present study was to test the null hypothesis that LCR evaluation does not alter specific components of orthodontic treatment planning in Class II patients.Materials and Methods:Records of 75 patients, who had been treated at the Department of Orthodontics, Centre of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich comprised the study material. Inclusion criteria were: (1) adolescents between the age of 12-15, (2) permanent dentition with Class II buccal segment relationship (3) absence of craniofacial and dento-alveolar malformations. Fifteen orthodontists from the dental faculties of Istanbul University, Istanbul and Ege University, Izmir filled out Likert-type linear scale questionnaires without knowing that they would repeat the same procedure with and without LCRs at two different time points. Equivalence and clinical relevance were assessed using (%95 CI) Wilcoxon signed rank tests.Results:Extraction decision did not differ between groups (p=0.68). Preference of functional appliance use (p=0.006) and inter-maxillary fixed functional appliance (p=0.043) was different among groups.Conclusion:LCR evaluation has minor influence on treatment planning procedure of Class II patients. It might be beneficial to consider its prescription not in a routine manner but as a supplementary tool considering possible reduction of radiation exposure.

scholarly journals Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage

2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mevlut Celikoglu ◽  
Tuba Unal ◽  
Mehmet Bayram ◽  
Celal Candirli
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Present Case Report ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Mandibular Retrusion ◽  
Leveling And Alignment

ABSTRACTBased on our literature search, we found that the use of miniplate anchorage with Forsus fatigue-resistance device (FRD) has not yet been reported. Therefore, the aim of the present case report was to present the treatment of a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion using Forsus FRD with miniplate anchorage. Fixed appliances with 0.022-inch slots were attached to the maxillary teeth and after 8 months of the leveling and alignment of the upper arch, 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire was inserted and cinched back. Two weeks after the placement of the miniplates bilaterally at the symphysis of the mandible, Forsus FRD was adjusted to the miniplates with a 35-mm length of rod chosen. Nine months after the skeletal anchored Forsus worn, Class I canine and molar relations were achieved and overjet was eliminated.

scholarly journals Management of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Non-Complaint Patient using Powerscope - A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Akram Ansari ◽  
Abhay Kumar Jain ◽  
Ankit Singh ◽  
Priya Sharma ◽  
Muneeb Adil
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Adolescent Male ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

Class II malocclusion in pubertal phase presents a major and a common challenge to orthodontists. Proper diagnosis and treatment planning in early stage help in preventing and intercepting the severity of malocclusion. In pubertal phase skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion are best treated with functional appliance. In recent time PowerScope fixed functional appliance is gaining immense popularity as noncompliant Class II corrector. In the present case report an adolescent male patient having Class II division 1 malocclusion with functional jaw retrusion was treated using MBT 0.022” prescription and PowerScope appliance. 7-8 months of PowerScope wear obtained stable and successful results with improvement in facial profile, skeletal jaw relationship and mild increase in IMPA. It can thus be concluded that PowerScope gives good results in Class II correction with a combination of patient comfort and ease of use that was unmatched among other appliances

Short-term dentoskeletal changes following Class II treatment using a fixed functional appliance: the Austro Repositioner

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-156
Author(s):  
M. Dolores Austro ◽  
Encarnación González ◽  
M. Angustias Peñalver ◽  
Domingo Pérez ◽  
José Antonio Alarcón
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Class Ii Treatment ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance

scholarly journals Indian Board of Orthodontics Case Report: Management of Skeletal Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Single-Phase Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Along With Forsus FRD Fixed Functional Appliance

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208
Author(s):  
Ashish Garg
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

This case report was submitted to the board under category II for the Indian Board of Orthodontics examination in November 2017. This case report illustrated the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion by pre-adjusted appliance along with Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device (FRD) fixed functional appliance (single-phase treatment) in a 13.6 year-old female patient whose growth was about to cease. The summary of the treatment, various records, treatment progress, and critical appraisal are reprinted here with minimal editing and reformatting, and hence, the presentation resembles the actual documents submitted to the board.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document