scholarly journals Animal models used to study direct peripheral nerve repair: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
FranciscoJavier Vela ◽  
Guadalupe Martínez-Chacón ◽  
Alberto Ballestín ◽  
JoséLuis Campos ◽  
FranciscoMiguel Sánchez-Margallo ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Weili Xia ◽  
Zhongfei Bai ◽  
Rongxia Dai ◽  
Jiaqi Zhang ◽  
Jiani Lu ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury can result in both sensory and motor deficits, and these impairments can last for a long period after nerve repair. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effects of sensory re-education (SR) on facilitating hand function recovery after peripheral nerve repair. METHODS: This systematic review was limited to articles published from 1970 to 20 December 2020. Electronic searching was performed in CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Medline databases to include trials investigating the effects of SR training on hand function recovery after peripheral nerve repair and included only those studies with controlled comparisons. RESULTS: Sixteen articles were included in final data synthesis. We found that only four studies could be rated as having good quality and noted obvious methodological limitations in the remaining studies. The current evidence showed that early SR with mirror visual feedback and the combinational use of classic SR and topical temporary anesthetic seemed to have long- and short-term effects, respectively on improving the sensibility and reducing the disabilities of the hand. The evidence to support the effects of conventional classical SR on improving hand functions was not strong. CONCLUSIONS: Further well-designed trials are needed to evaluate the effects of different SR techniques on hand function after nerve repair over short- and long-term periods.


Microsurgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Roberts ◽  
S. Thibaudeau ◽  
J. C. Burrell ◽  
E. L. Zager ◽  
D. K. Cullen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erin M. Wolfe ◽  
Sydney A. Mathis ◽  
Steven A. Ovadia ◽  
Zubin J. Panthaki

Abstract Introduction Collagen and human amniotic membrane (hAM) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomaterials that can be used as nerve wraps or conduits for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Both biomaterials have been shown to reduce scarring and fibrosis of injured peripheral nerves. However, comparative advantages and disadvantages have not been definitively shown in the literature. The purpose of this systematic review is to comprehensively evaluate the literature regarding the roles of hAM and collagen nerve wraps and conduits on peripheral nerve regeneration in preclinical models. Methods The MEDLINE database was queried using the PubMed search engine on July 7, 2019, with the following search strategy: (“amniotic membrane” OR “amnion”) OR (“collagen conduit” OR “nerve wrap”)] AND “nerve.” All resulting articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Nerve type, lesion type/injury model, repair type, treatment, and outcomes were assessed. Results Two hundred and fifty-eight articles were identified, and 44 studies remained after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seventeen studies utilized hAM, whereas 27 studies utilized collagen wraps or conduits. Twenty-three (85%) of the collagen studies utilized conduits, and four (15%) utilized wraps. Six (35%) of the hAM studies utilized conduits and 11 (65%) utilized wraps. Two (9%) collagen studies involving a conduit and one (25%) involving a wrap demonstrated at least one significant improvement in outcomes compared with a control. While none of the hAM conduit studies showed significant improvements, eight (73%) of the studies investigating hAM wraps showed at least one significant improvement in outcomes. Conclusion The majority of studies reported positive outcomes, indicating that collagen and hAM nerve wraps and conduits both have the potential to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. However, relatively few studies reported significant findings, except for studies evaluating hAM wraps. Preclinical models may help guide clinical practice regarding applications of these biomaterials in peripheral nerve repair.


2011 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 2381-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mojib Sameem ◽  
Thomas J. Wood ◽  
James R. Bain

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Harris ◽  
Suzie C. Tindall

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1145-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Fang Zhang ◽  
Liejing Lu ◽  
Haojiang Li ◽  
Xuehua Wen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1010-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Bozkurt ◽  
Sebastian E Dunda ◽  
Dan O'Dey DM ◽  
Gary A Brook ◽  
Christoph V Suschek ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document