scholarly journals Radiographic and histological evaluation of ectopic application of deproteinized bovine bone matrix

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
CarlaCastiglia Gonzaga ◽  
RodrigoCarlos da Silva ◽  
VivianeRozeira Crivellaro ◽  
AllanFernando Giovanini ◽  
Rafaela Scariot ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. e127-e132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Wiltfang ◽  
Nadine Jätschmann ◽  
Jürgen Hedderich ◽  
Friedrich W. Neukam ◽  
Karl Andreas Schlegel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Taschieri ◽  
Tiziano Testori ◽  
Stefano Corbella ◽  
Roberto Weinstein ◽  
Luca Francetti ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 1236-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miusi Shi ◽  
Can Wang ◽  
Yulan Wang ◽  
Cuizhu Tang ◽  
Richard J. Miron ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-697
Author(s):  
João Ricardo Almeida Grossi ◽  
Rodrigo Bonacin ◽  
Viviane Rozeira Crivelaro ◽  
Allan Fernando Giovanini ◽  
João César Zielak ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bozidar Brkovic ◽  
Milan Radulovic ◽  
Vesna Danilovic

Background. Different materials are used to prevent the resorption of alveolar bone. The aim of this report was to show the radiographical and histological results prior to implant insertion, when a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (BioOss) and calcium-sulphate were placed into the extraction socket immediately after the tooth removal. Case report. A 22-year-old woman was scheduled for the removal of the second lower molar when the extraction socket was filled with BioOss covered with calcium-sulphate as a resorbable membrane. Primary closure of the surgical site was performed. Radiography was done 4 and 12 months later. One year after the surgery, when the implant was inserted, a biopsy of the new regenerated bone was obtained for the histological evaluation. The lamellar bone was evident using both materials. The resorption of BioOss was slow and the connective tissue was observed. Conclusion. Both materials had biocompatible and oseoconductive properties. One year after the grafting procedure, we observed the lamellar bone and partial resorption of BioOss, while calciumsulphate showed no significant effect as a resorbable membrane.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1906
Author(s):  
Marwa Y. Shaheen ◽  
Amani M. Basudan ◽  
Abdurahman A. Niazy ◽  
Jeroen J. J. P. van den Beucken ◽  
John A. Jansen ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the regeneration of bone defects created in the femoral condyle of osteoporotic rats, following intravenous (IV) zoledronate (ZA) treatment in three settings: pre-bone grafting (ZA-Pre), post-bone grafting (ZA-Post), and pre- plus post-bone grafting (ZA-Pre+Post). Twenty-four female Wistar rats were ovariectomized (OVX). After 12 weeks, bone defects were created in the left femoral condyle. All defects were grafted with a particulate inorganic cancellous bovine bone substitute. ZA (0.04 mg/kg, weekly) was administered to six rats 4 weeks pre-bone graft placement. To another six rats, ZA was given post-bone graft placement creation and continued for 6 weeks. Additional six rats received ZA treatment pre- and post-bone graft placement. Control animals received weekly saline intravenous injections. At 6 weeks post-bone graft placement, samples were retrieved for histological evaluation of the bone area percentage (BA%) and remaining bone graft percentage (RBG%). BA% for ZA-Pre (50.1 ± 3.5%) and ZA-Post (49.2 ± 8.2%) rats was significantly increased compared to that of the controls (35.4 ± 5.4%, p-value 0.031 and 0.043, respectively). In contrast, ZA-Pre+Post rats (40.7 ± 16.0%) showed similar BA% compared to saline controls (p = 0.663). For RBG%, all experimental groups showed similar results ranging from 36.3 to 47.1%. Our data indicate that pre- or post-surgical systemic IV administration of ZA improves the regeneration of bone defects grafted with inorganic cancellous bovine-bone particles in osteoporotic bone conditions. However, no favorable effect on bone repair was seen for continued pre- plus post-surgical ZA treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document