Efficacy of darolac probiotic and chlorhexidine mouth rinse in reducing plaque and gingival inflammation in children: A clinical trial

Author(s):  
Sugandha Arya ◽  
Yogesh Bande ◽  
Sharda Ade ◽  
Sudhir Baroopal ◽  
Akshada Joshi ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
SahanaUmesh Baratakke ◽  
Rekha Raju ◽  
Sushi Kadanakuppe ◽  
NagashreeR Savanur ◽  
Radha Gubbihal ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Ausenda ◽  
Natalie Jeong ◽  
Peter Arsenault ◽  
Robert Gyurko ◽  
Matthew Finkelman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diah Ayu Maharani ◽  
Alia Ramadhani ◽  
Melissa Adiatman ◽  
Yuniardini Septorini Wimardhani ◽  
Linda Kusdhany ◽  
...  

Objective: This study aimed at comparing the antiplaque, anticalculus, and antigingivitis potentials of a mouth rinse containing essential oil, alcohol,zinc, and fluoride with a mouth rinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) 0.1% over 1-, 2-, and 3-month periods.Methods: This study was a double-blind, parallel randomized clinical trial with a 3-day run-in phase. Respondents were asked to gargle twice dailywith 15 ml of mouth rinse for 30 seconds after brushing teeth. Respondents were 80 females with a mean age of 21 years, and a single dental examinerwas employed throughout the study to decrease the variance. Prophylaxis was performed for all respondents before the intervention. Three mouthrinses were tested: Group 1 with the mouth rinse containing CPC 0.1%, Group 2 as the negative control, and Group 3 as the positive control with amouth rinse containing alcohol. Evaluations were conducted by plaque index, gingival index, calculus index, and CariScreen examinations.Results: The clinical trial showed that the mouth rinse with alcohol and the mouth rinse containing CPC 0.1% were effective in inhibiting bacterialbuildup (antiplaque) and have anticalculus properties, but with no statistically significant antigingivitis effect.Conclusion: It was found that the mouth rinse containing alcohol has similar effectiveness with CPC 0.1% mouth rinse, but side effects, such as aburning sensation, were reported in the alcohol-containing mouth rinse.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 465-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Herrera ◽  
Nayra Escudero ◽  
Leire Pérez ◽  
María Otheo ◽  
Elena Cañete-Sánchez ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre W. Van Zy ◽  
Johan Hartshorne ◽  
Alonso Carrasco-Labra

This study describes a systematic review of the best available evidence on the effectiveness of a chlorhexidine mouth rinse as a mono-therapy or as an adjunct to mechanical oral hygiene against plaque growth and gingival inflammation. Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials were searched up to April 2011. Randomised controlled clinical trials that compared chlorhexidine to placebo or controlled mouth rinses or regular oral hygiene for a minimum duration of at least four weeks amongst gingivitis patients (≥ 18 years of age) were included. A total of 30 publications fulfilled the selection criteria. Clinical parameters measured at baseline and end of trial were plaque, gingival inflammation, bleeding and staining. Chlorhexidine reduced plaque by 33% and gingivitis by 26% compared to a placebo or a control mouth rinse. The investigators concluded that when used together with oral hygiene, chlorhexidine mouth rinses provide significant reductions in plaque and gingivitis scores in gingivitis patients, but a significant increase in staining compared to placebo or control mouth rinses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (12) ◽  
pp. 1569-1583
Author(s):  
Jonathan B. Levine ◽  
Jordan Goncalves ◽  
Daniel Nguyen ◽  
Olivia Nguyen ◽  
Hatice Hasturk

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 948-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana M. P. Pinto ◽  
Guilherme C. de Freitas ◽  
Danilo A. Dutra ◽  
Karla Z. Kantorski ◽  
Carlos H. Moreira

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document