scholarly journals Spread of local anesthetic after thoracic erector spinae and thoracic paravertebral block in patients with multiple posterolateral rib fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 557
Author(s):  
Abhijit Nair ◽  
Sandeep Diwan
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 90.1-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelghafour Elkoundi ◽  
Hicham Balkhi ◽  
Mustapha Bensghir ◽  
Abdelouahed Baite

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 1005-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Garutti ◽  
Monica Hervias ◽  
Jose Maria Barrio ◽  
Fernando Fortea ◽  
Jesus de la Torre

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 1231-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin V. Nielsen ◽  
Bernhard Moriggl ◽  
Romed Hoermann ◽  
Thomas D. Nielsen ◽  
Thomas F. Bendtsen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 2085-2091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ge Yeying ◽  
Yuan Liyong ◽  
Chen Yuebo ◽  
Zhang Yu ◽  
Ye Guangao ◽  
...  

Objectives To assess the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on pain management and preservation of pulmonary function compared with intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). Methods Ninety patients with unilateral MRFs were included in this prospective study and randomly assigned to the TPVB or IVPCA group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, blood gas analysis, and bedside spirometry were measured and recorded at different time points after analgesia. Results TPVB and IVPCA provided good pain relief. VAS scores were significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the IVPCA group at rest and during coughing ( P < 0.05). Patients in the TPVB group had a higher PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 and lower P(A–a)O2 compared with the IVPCA group ( P < 0.05). Moreover, patients in the TPVB group showed higher FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEFR, and fewer complications than did the IVPCA group ( P < 0.05). Conclusion TPVB is superior to IVPCA in pain relief and preservation of pulmonary function in patients with MRFs.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Zhen Xu ◽  
Xue Li ◽  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Zheng-Ye Liu ◽  
Lin-Lin Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel inter-fascial plane block, which is applied more and more in postoperative pain control, especially in chest surgery. Attention is increasingly paid to its premium analgesia in urological surgery. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether ESPB would have similar analgesia compared with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in laparoscopic nephroureterectomy surgery.Methods and analysis: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial will enroll 166 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 into receiving ESPB or TPVB before surgery. Both ultrasound-guided ESPB or TPVB will be performed with an injection of 0.375% ropivacaine 0.4ml/kg before anesthesia induction. Standardized patients controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) will be applied for each patient. The primary endpoint is the joint of cumulative 24h opioid (sufentanil) consumption and average pain score via numeric rating scale (NRS) at 24th h after surgery. Secondary endpoints include rescued analgesic demand, cumulative opioid consumption and pain NRS scores at different preset timepoint within 48h after surgery. Other predefined outcomes include clinical features of blockage, quality of recovery, subjective sleep quality, time to ambulation and flatus, and adverse events, as well as length of stay in hospital and anesthesia cost. Discussion: Previous studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of ESPB only concentrated on a single endpoint for postoperative pain evaluation, while studies focusing on the direct comparation between ESPB and TPVB in urological surgery is still lacking. Our study is the first trial in non-inferiority design of comparing ESPB and TPVB in patient undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy surgery, and the primary outcome is the joint endpoint of opioid consumption and pain NRS score.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR 2000031916. Registered on 14 April 2020. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=50782


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document