Trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction tendon interposition technique experience for the first carpometacarpal joint arthrosis: Review of the literature in the diagnosis and treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Gokce Yildiran ◽  
Zekeriya Tosun
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
First Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Tendon Interposition

scholarly journals Functional outcome of ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition after failed first carpometacarpal joint prosthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142
Author(s):  
Lyne Anthonissen ◽  
Elke Van Eynde ◽  
Maarten Van Nuffel ◽  
Luc De Smet
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Strength Loss ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Joint Prosthesis ◽  
Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
First Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Quick Dash ◽  
Tendon Interposition

The purpose is to determine if ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) is a recommendable salvage option for failed total joint prosthesis of the first carpometacarpal joint. Twenty-two patients in our database met the in- clusion criteria for this retrospective study, with at least 6 months follow-up. Fourteen participated and were invited for a clinical examination and asked to fill out two questionnaires. They were evaluated for pain (VAS), impairment (NHS), disability (Quick DASH), opposition (Kapandji test) and grip strength (hydraulic dynamometer). Results of the questionnaires were compared to a cohort study of primary LRTI’s. Kapandji test and grip strength were compared to the contralateral side. Compared to primary LRTI’s, revision surgery showed mild deterioration of impairment and disability. The average VAS score was 2.9 out of 10. Twelve patients mentioned a sense of strength loss, which could be quantified with the dynamometer : a mean of 15.1 kg (operated thumb) versus 20.5 kg (contralateral). There was a relatively small decline of opposition with Kapandji 8.6 versus 9.9. The overall satisfaction was good for 8 patients, fair for 3 and poor for the remaining 3 (mainly based on strength loss). One patient needed a second revision. Failed first carpometacarpal joint replacement can be salvaged by ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition, providing an acceptable functional outcome in 79% of cases studied. However, compared to the functional outcome of primary LRTI’s, mild aggravation of impairment and disability should be taken into account.

Simple trapeziectomy versus trapeziectomy with flexor carpi radialis suspension: a 17-year follow-up of a randomized blind trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 175319342095296
Author(s):  
Adrian Brennan ◽  
Julia Blackburn ◽  
Jane Thomson ◽  
Jeremy Field
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Tendon Interposition

The purpose of this study was to investigate if there were any significant differences in the long-term outcomes of patients who participated in a randomized trial of trapeziectomy alone compared with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Sixty-five patients were invited for a follow-up visit at a mean of 17 years (range 15–20) postoperatively. Twenty-eight patients attended, who had 34 operations, 14 trapeziectomy alone and 20 with LRTI. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of satisfaction with surgery or functional outcomes, with most measurements showing minimal or no differences in means between the two groups. There was no difference in the space between the metacarpal and scaphoid. Radial abduction was the only parameter that was significantly greater in the patients with simple trapeziectomy (median 79°) compared with trapeziectomy with LRTI (median 71°) ( p = 0.04). Even at 17 years there is no significant benefit of LRTI over trapeziectomy alone for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Level of evidence: I

Thumb-Basal Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Metacarpal Subsidence: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Trapeziectomy With Suture Button Suspensionplasty Versus Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472199422
Author(s):  
Owolabi Shonuga ◽  
Kristen Nicholson ◽  
Jack Abboudi ◽  
Gregory Gallant ◽  
Christopher Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Basal Joint ◽  
Tendon Interposition ◽  
Cmc Joint

Background Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Methods Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand ( QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. Results Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [ P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [ P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [ P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [ P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [ P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. Conclusions Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document