Mexican American Religion and Spirituality

Author(s):  
Grace Peña Delgado
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Cadge

AbstractReligion and spirituality are present in many organizations in the contemporary United States. While religious studies scholars have traditionally focused on local congregations, some are branching out to explore religion in a broader range of public institutions. Between 1950, when many scholars conceptualized American religion in terms of Will Herberg's classic Protestant-Catholic-Jew and the present, chapels in public institutions including the military, healthcare centers, universities, prisons and airports have expanded and diversified. I focus on airports tracing the evolution of airport chapels from Catholic centered to more multi-faith to more religiously inclusive as unlikely, or perhaps just hidden, analytic mirrors for demographic and cultural changes in American religion. Theoretically, these chapels are case studies that show how the function and appropriate place for religion in public institutions has been improvised and negotiated locally. The clergy, airport personnel and airport chaplains who make decisions about these spaces lack consistent education about the topic and receive inconsistent guidance from laws and policies across city, state, and federal contexts. The chapel spaces that result are, therefore, much more varied than one might expect and shaped as much by fears about what could cause conflict as by responses to actual conflicts.


1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 783-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry J. Coet

A sample of 100 subjects was characterized by sex, race (Caucasian-Mexican American), religion (affiliation-no affiliation), and geographic location (urban-rural). Subjects were given a questionnaire asking them to rank five groups of individuals they considered handicapped. Spearman rhos indicated that defining “handicap” differed significantly according to sex, race, religion, and geographic location. Males emphasized “lack of education,” while females stressed “deafness” and “birth defects.” Mexican Americans listed “minority” more frequently whereas Caucasian subjects placed more emphasis on “deafness” and “physical injury.” Subjects who had no religious affiliation were more concerned with “speech” and “minority” conditions. Urban subjects ranked the “minority” condition fifth while the rural group of subjects ranked the same condition tenth.


Addiction ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 1705-1716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra K. Burge ◽  
Nancy Amodei ◽  
Bernice Elkin ◽  
Selina Catala ◽  
Sylvia Rodriguez Andrew ◽  
...  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (28) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. N. Valdez ◽  
Andreana Jezzini
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document