The Evaluation of 360-Degree Feedback Programs

Author(s):  
John C. Scott ◽  
Manuel London
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
pp. 227-247
Author(s):  
John W. Fleenor
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas N. Garavan ◽  
Michael Morley ◽  
Mary Flynn

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2019-002133
Author(s):  
Katherine Webber ◽  
Rebecca Selman

BackgroundMultisource feedback provides ratings of a trainee doctor’s performance from a range of assessors and enables 360 degree feedback on communication skills and team working behaviours. It is a tool used throughout palliative medicine training in the UK. There are limited data on the value of multisource feedback from a palliative medicine trainee perspective.AimTo study the views of palliative medicine trainees regarding multisource feedback as an educational tool to develop communication skills.DesignA multimodal study encompassing a focus group and questionnaire mailed to all deanery palliative doctors.Setting/participantsAll palliative medicine trainees within a UK training deanery.ResultsOver half of responding trainees thought multisource feedback had little or no impact on their clinical practice. Improvements in delivery of multisource feedback to maximise learning were identified, including skilled feedback and facilitation by educational supervisors.ConclusionsDespite multisource feedback currently having limited benefits, a number of recommendations are suggested to improve this.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document