Gifted and Talented Program Development

2015 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Gabriele Baudson ◽  
Franzis Preckel

Background: Currently, no recently normed group intelligence test for primary school children is available in Germany to cover verbal, numerical, and figural reasoning abilities. Furthermore, no test for this age group is difficult enough to be able to differentiate especially at the upper end of the intelligence distribution. Aims: The Test for (Highly) Intelligent Kids – T(H)INK was developed to fill this gap. Methods: A total of 1,629 children from grades 1 to 3 of primary school took the 36-item test (one version per class level). Results: At all three class levels, the test proved sufficiently reliable (Cronbach’s α = .73–.80 for the full scale). Retest reliabilities after 1 year, assessed for a random subsample, ranged from .61 to .73. Factorial validity was established by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with a g factor explaining 57.61–63.67% of the variance. Furthermore, convergent validity (correlations with a nonverbal intelligence test, teacher and parent ratings, grades, and the probability for the child to be nominated for a gifted and talented program) was satisfying, as was the predictive validity for average marks a year later. Discussion: Implications of the findings and ideas for future research and development of the test are discussed.


Roeper Review ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Gratz ◽  
Jerry L. Pulley

1984 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail E. Hanninen

Recognizing and developing a gifted preschooler's ability is an initial step in the growth of a child. The discussion of basic principles and evidence of effectiveness here addresses two major areas of concern in gifted preschool program development: identification and the learning environment. The data discussed were collected on children ages 3-5 who participated in two rural preschool gifted and gifted-handicapped classrooms in Montana. The findings indicate the need for the use of several different types of instruments in the selection process, and an emphasis on enrichment and flexibility in designing the learning environment.


1979 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60
Author(s):  
Gloria Downing ◽  
Anita Todd

Excellence in the education of the gifted student demands an equally excellent education of the teachers of the gifted and of the supporting educational community. A long-range program of staff development must be an integral part of any process of program development and maintenance. In this change-agentry model, staff development activities are viewed within a framework of three program stages: awareness, implementation, and maintenance. Selection of inservice activities appropriate to each stage are based on the developmental theories of Bloom (cognitive) and Krathwohl (affective) and on Renzulli's Enrichment Triad Model for gifted students.


G/C/T ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Gina Ginsberg-Riggs ◽  
Ann Weiner ◽  
Elizabeth Stimson

We have a nine year old boy with an IQ of 139 who does well in all his subjects. Two mornings a week he goes to the school's gifted and talented program which he likes very much. He knows all the work in his regular classes. It may challenge the other students, but it is boring for him. He has become somewhat of a behavior problem by making faces, dropping his books, teasing and calling out answers. The school suggested an evaluation to which we gladly agreed, hoping that they would realize that a more challenging curriculum would motivate him and stop his silly behavior. Imagine our upset when the school psychologist suggested therapy instead! We have not agreed to this because we feel that the right kind of education wilt correct his behavior. We have lost all faith in the school. Could G/C/T please publish a list of public and private schools for gifted children?


G/C/T ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Anne M. Perry ◽  
Jon Shoop

How can a school encourage meaningful parental involvement in its programs? Professional educators are sometimes justified in feeling that meetings which seek parent input will result, instead, in “gripe sessions.” School boards know the frustrating reality that community members with complaints are heard from far more often than those with compliments. To keep a positive attitude operating in the total community is a necessary and worthy goal for school districts to pursue. We had an idea which worked very well for our school district and might be useful to yours. This article describes how we organized and held a “Reflections for Living” workshop with parents of children who were participating in the school district's gifted and talented program. This type of workshop brought welcome perspective to adults by improving interpersonal relationships. It proved to be a good beginning for increased participation of the total community in the school's program. — A.M.P./J.S.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document