scholarly journals Corn Yield Response to Water Availability

Author(s):  
T. Newell ◽  
K. Roozeboom ◽  
G. J. Kluitenberg ◽  
I. A. Ciampitti
1980 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Morgan ◽  
Arlo W. Biere ◽  
Edward T. Kanemasu

Author(s):  
J. P. Broeckelman ◽  
G. J. Kluitenberg ◽  
K. Roozeboom ◽  
I. A. Ciampitti

1990 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Swan ◽  
J. A. Staricka ◽  
M. J. Shaffer ◽  
W. H. Paulson ◽  
A. E. Peterson

1980 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 0092-0098 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Mustek ◽  
D. A. Dusek

Author(s):  
J. P. Broeckelman ◽  
E. A. Adee ◽  
G. J. Kluitenberg ◽  
I. A. Ciampitti

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando Martins dos Santos ◽  
Luis Mauro Gonçalves Rosa ◽  
Lucia Brandão Franke ◽  
Carlos Nabinger

The experiment was carried out in pots in a glasshouse, with one plant per pot and nine repetitions per treatment. The treatments consisted of free or restricted leaves, submited to 90-100% or 60-70% soil field capacity (FC). Only independent effects of water availability or leaf movement were observed on yield components. Plants under well-watered conditions and with freely orienting leaves were taller, and had a larger number of ramifications. The greater development favored the setting of a higher number of inflorescences per plant in these treatments. This behavior resulted in a high number of flowers, green and mature legumes per plant, thus resulting in high seed production which was the most evident response to water availability. Although individual seed weight was higher in the water stress treatment, total seed production was higher for well-watered plants, with no statistically significant effect of leaf movements.


2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Nash ◽  
Kelly A. Nelson ◽  
Peter P. Motavalli ◽  
Stephen H. Anderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document