On Extensions of Topologies

1967 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 474-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos J. R. Borges

If (X, τ) is a topological space (with topology τ) and A is a subset of X, then the topology τ(A) = {U ⋃ (V ⋂ A)|U, V ∈ τ} is said to be a simple extension of τ. It seems that N. Levine introduced this concept in (4) and he proved, among other results, the following:(A) If (X, τ) is a regular (completely regular) space and A is a closed subset of X, then (X, τ(A)) is a regular (completely regular) space.(B) Let (X, τ) be a normal space, and A a closed subset of X. Then (X, τ(A)) is normal if and only if X — A is a normal subspace of (X, τ).(C) Let (X, τ) be a countably compact (compact or Lindelöf) and A ∉ τ.

Author(s):  
V. V. Mykhaylyuk

A connection between the separability and the countable chain condition of spaces withL-property (a topological spaceXhasL-property if for every topological spaceY, separately continuous functionf:X×Y→ℝand open setI⊆ℝ,the setf−1(I)is anFσ-set) is studied. We show that every completely regular Baire space with theL-property and the countable chain condition is separable and constructs a nonseparable completely regular space with theL-property and the countable chain condition. This gives a negative answer to a question of M. Burke.


1975 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Tweddle

The main aim of the present note is to compare C(X) and C(υX), the spaces of real-valued continuous functions on a completely regular space X and its real 1–1 compactification υX, with regard to weak compactness and weak countable compactness. In a sense to be made precise below, it is shown that C(X) and C(υX) have the same absolutely convex weakly countably compact sets. In certain circumstances countable compactness may be replaced by compactness, in which case one obtains a nice representation of the Mackey completion of the dual space of C(X) (Theorems 5, 6, 7).


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 68-73
Author(s):  
O.I. Pavlov

One of the central tasks in the theory of condensations is to describe topological properties that can be improved by condensation (i.e. a continuous one-to-one mapping). Most of the known counterexamples in the field deal with non-hereditary properties. We construct a countably compact linearly ordered (hence, monotonically normal, thus ” very strongly” hereditarily normal) topological space whose square and higher powers cannot be condensed onto a normal space. The constructed space is necessarily pseudocompact in all the powers, which complements a known result on condensations of non-pseudocompact spaces.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-263
Author(s):  
V. Mykhaylyuk ◽  
O. Karlova

In 1932 Sierpi\'nski proved that every real-valued separately continuous function defined on the plane $\mathbb R^2$ is determined uniquely on any everywhere dense subset of $\mathbb R^2$. Namely, if two separately continuous functions coincide of an everywhere dense subset of $\mathbb R^2$, then they are equal at each point of the plane. Piotrowski and Wingler showed that above-mentioned results can be transferred to maps with values in completely regular spaces. They proved that if every separately continuous function $f:X\times Y\to \mathbb R$ is feebly continuous, then for every completely regular space $Z$ every separately continuous map defined on $X\times Y$ with values in $Z$ is determined uniquely on everywhere dense subset of $X\times Y$. Henriksen and Woods proved that for an infinite cardinal $\aleph$, an $\aleph^+$-Baire space $X$ and a topological space $Y$ with countable $\pi$-character every separately continuous function $f:X\times Y\to \mathbb R$ is also determined uniquely on everywhere dense subset of $X\times Y$. Later, Mykhaylyuk proved the same result for a Baire space $X$, a topological space $Y$ with countable $\pi$-character and Urysohn space $Z$. Moreover, it is natural to consider weaker conditions than separate continuity. The results in this direction were obtained by Volodymyr Maslyuchenko and Filipchuk. They proved that if $X$ is a Baire space, $Y$ is a topological space with countable $\pi$-character, $Z$ is Urysohn space, $A\subseteq X\times Y$ is everywhere dense set, $f:X\times Y\to Z$ and $g:X\times Y\to Z$ are weakly horizontally quasi-continuous, continuous with respect to the second variable, equi-feebly continuous wuth respect to the first one and such that $f|_A=g|_A$, then $f=g$. In this paper we generalize all of the results mentioned above. Moreover, we analize classes of topological spaces wich are favorable for Sierpi\'nsi-type theorems.


1984 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Swardson

Let X be a topological space and let A ⊂ X. The character of A in X is the minimal cardinal of a base for the neighborhoods of A in X. Previous studies have shown that the character of certain subsets of X (or of X2) is related to compactness conditions on X. For example, in [12], Ginsburg proved that if the diagonalof a space X has countable character in X2, then X is metrizable and the set of nonisolated points of X is compact. In [2], Aull showed that if every closed subset of X has countable character, then the set of nonisolated points of X is countably compact. In [18], we noted that if every closed subset of X has countable character, then MA + ┐ CH (Martin's axiom with the negation of the continuum hypothesis) implies that X is paracompact.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ľubica Holá

AbstractWe show that a completely regular space Y is a p-space (a Čech-complete space, a locally compact space) if and only if given a dense subspace A of any topological space X and a continuous f: A → Y there are a p-embedded subset (resp. a G δ-subset, an open subset) M of X containing A and a quasicontinuous subcontinuous extension f*: M → Y of f continuous at every point of A. A result concerning a continuous extension to a residual set is also given.


1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1208-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Vaughan

In [1, p. 41, Theorem 3.10] Arhangel'skiï proved that the perfect image of a completely regular space of countable type is of countable type, and he asked [1, p. 60, problem 4] if a similar result held for regular or Hausdorff spaces. In this paper, it is proved that the perfect image of a space of countable type is of countable type, provided that the image is Hausdorff or regular. An affirmative answer to both of Arhangel'skiï's questions follows immediately from this. Arhangel'skiï made use of the Stone-Čech compactification in the proof of his result, but the proofs below are of a different nature.Let X be a topological space and let K ⊂ X. A collection of open sets is called a base at K provided that for every open set W ⊃ K there exists such that K ⊂ U ⊂ W. Clearly, we may assume that every member of contains K.


1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Grubb ◽  
Tim LaBerge

AbstractWe give a direct proof that the space of Baire quasi-measures on a completely regular space (or the space of Borel quasi-measures on a normal space) is compact Hausdorff. We show that it is possible for the space of Borel quasi-measures on a non-normal space to be non-compact. This result also provides an example of a Baire quasi-measure that has no extension to a Borel quasi-measure. Finally, we give a concise proof of theWheeler-Shakmatov theorem, which states that if X is normal and dim(X) ≤ 1, then every quasi-measure on X extends to a measure.


1986 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-159
Author(s):  
Hans-Peter Künzi ◽  
Peter Fletcher

AbstractA topological space X is said to be somewhat normal provided that for each open cover is a normal cover of X. We show that a completely regular somewhat normal space need not be normal, thereby answering a question of W. M. Fleischman. We note that a collectionwise normal somewhat normal space need not be almost 2-fully normal, as had previously been asserted, and that neither the perfect image nor the perfect preimage of a somewhat normal space has to be somewhat normal.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (03) ◽  
pp. 1550032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. M. Alves ◽  
Victor H. L. Rocha ◽  
Josiney A. Souza

This paper proves that uniform spaces and admissible spaces form the same class of topological spaces. This result characterizes a completely regular space as a topological space that admits an admissible family of open coverings. In addition, the admissible family of coverings provides an interesting methodology of studying aspects of uniformity and dynamics in completely regular spaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document