Spaces of Quasi-Measures

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Grubb ◽  
Tim LaBerge

AbstractWe give a direct proof that the space of Baire quasi-measures on a completely regular space (or the space of Borel quasi-measures on a normal space) is compact Hausdorff. We show that it is possible for the space of Borel quasi-measures on a non-normal space to be non-compact. This result also provides an example of a Baire quasi-measure that has no extension to a Borel quasi-measure. Finally, we give a concise proof of theWheeler-Shakmatov theorem, which states that if X is normal and dim(X) ≤ 1, then every quasi-measure on X extends to a measure.

1967 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 474-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos J. R. Borges

If (X, τ) is a topological space (with topology τ) and A is a subset of X, then the topology τ(A) = {U ⋃ (V ⋂ A)|U, V ∈ τ} is said to be a simple extension of τ. It seems that N. Levine introduced this concept in (4) and he proved, among other results, the following:(A) If (X, τ) is a regular (completely regular) space and A is a closed subset of X, then (X, τ(A)) is a regular (completely regular) space.(B) Let (X, τ) be a normal space, and A a closed subset of X. Then (X, τ(A)) is normal if and only if X — A is a normal subspace of (X, τ).(C) Let (X, τ) be a countably compact (compact or Lindelöf) and A ∉ τ.


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Karim Boulabiar

AbstractThe precise condition on a completely regular space X for every character on C(X) to be an evaluation at some point in X is that X be realcompact. Usually, this classical result is obtained by relying heavily on involved (and even nonconstructive) extension arguments. This note provides a direct proof that is accessible to a large audience.


1969 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 181 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Thomas

Author(s):  
Hind Fadhil Abbas

The fusion of technology and science is a very complex and scientific phenomenon that still carries mysteries that need to be understood. To unravel these phenomena, mathematical models are beneficial to treat different systems with unpredictable system elements. Here, the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy ideal is studied with topological space. These concepts are useful to analyze new generalized intuitionistic models. The basic structure is studied here with various relations between the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy ideals and the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy topologies. This study includes intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces (IFS); the fundamental definitions of intuitionistic fuzzy Hausdorff space; intuitionistic fuzzy regular space; intuitionistic fuzzy normal space; intuitionistic fuzzy continuity; operations on IFS, the compactness and separation axioms.


Author(s):  
V. V. Mykhaylyuk

A connection between the separability and the countable chain condition of spaces withL-property (a topological spaceXhasL-property if for every topological spaceY, separately continuous functionf:X×Y→ℝand open setI⊆ℝ,the setf−1(I)is anFσ-set) is studied. We show that every completely regular Baire space with theL-property and the countable chain condition is separable and constructs a nonseparable completely regular space with theL-property and the countable chain condition. This gives a negative answer to a question of M. Burke.


1993 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney A. Morris ◽  
Vladimir G. Pestov

We prove that any open subgroup of the free abelian topological group on a completely regular space is a free abelian topological group. Moreover, the free topological bases of both groups have the same covering dimension. The prehistory of this result is as follows. The celebrated Nielsen–Schreier theorem states that every subgroup of a free group is free, and it is equally well known that every subgroup of a free abelian group is free abelian. The analogous result is not true for free (abelian) topological groups [1,5]. However, there exist certain sufficient conditions for a subgroup of a free topological group to be topologically free [2]; in particular, an open subgroup of a free topological group on a kω-space is topologically free. The corresponding question for free abelian topological groups asked 8 years ago by Morris [11] proved to be more difficult and remained open even within the realm of kω-spaces. In the present paper a comprehensive answer to this question is obtained.


1975 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Tweddle

The main aim of the present note is to compare C(X) and C(υX), the spaces of real-valued continuous functions on a completely regular space X and its real 1–1 compactification υX, with regard to weak compactness and weak countable compactness. In a sense to be made precise below, it is shown that C(X) and C(υX) have the same absolutely convex weakly countably compact sets. In certain circumstances countable compactness may be replaced by compactness, in which case one obtains a nice representation of the Mackey completion of the dual space of C(X) (Theorems 5, 6, 7).


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Izzo ◽  
Dimitris Papathanasiou

Abstract We strengthen, in various directions, the theorem of Garnett that every $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$ -compact, completely regular space $X$ occurs as a Gleason part for some uniform algebra. In particular, we show that the uniform algebra can always be chosen so that its maximal ideal space contains no analytic discs. We show that when the space $X$ is metrizable, the uniform algebra can be chosen so that its maximal ideal space is metrizable as well. We also show that for every locally compact subspace $X$ of a Euclidean space, there is a compact set $K$ in some $\mathbb{C}^{N}$ so that $\widehat{K}\backslash K$ contains a Gleason part homeomorphic to  $X$ , and $\widehat{K}$ contains no analytic discs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document