scholarly journals Appropriateness of Routine Crossmatch in Elective Caesarean Section for Low Risk Postpartum Hemorrhage Pregnancies

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngamchuen Sripunlom ◽  
Sarwinee Ratchanon ◽  
Sirisuk Ouitrakul
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Low Risk

scholarly journals Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous cesarean Section

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jha
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Previous Caesarean Section ◽  
Cephalopelvic Disproportion ◽  
Main Indication ◽  
Assisted Delivery ◽  
Vacuum Delivery

Background: The main aim of this study is to determine the maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy among women with one previous caesarean section at term in relation to vaginal delivery, post partum complication, neonatal complication like low Apgar score, fetal weight and admission in special baby unit. Methods: This is a prospective and descriptive study done in a sample size of 100. Inclusion criteria were term pregnancy, single live fetus with cephalic presentation with one previous caesarean section. During study period total number of obstetric admissions was 3546 and 115 cases were admitted with previous one caesarean section. Result: Out of 100 cases, 31 cases had vaginal delivery and 69 cases had caesarean section. Among 31 vaginal deliveries, 24 cases had spontaneous vaginal delivery and 7 had assisted delivery with vacuum, main indication of vacuum delivery was to cut short the second stage of labor that was in 5(71.43%) cases. Among 69 caesarean section cases, 51 had emergency caesarean section and 18 had elective caesarean section and cephalopelvic disproportion was the main indication in both the groups. Most common complication was scar dehiscence and postpartum hemorrhage. There were two still births in each group and one minute APGAR score was slightly better in caesarean section. Conclusions: Patients with previous caesarean section are at high risk of repeat emergency or elective caesarean section. About one in three patients with previous caesarean section delivered vaginally. In the present study postpartum hemorrhage was the commonest complication, which was found in caesarean section, and only  one puerperal pyrexia was seen in case of vaginal delivery. Key words: Cephalopelvic disproportion, Premature rupture of membrane, Septicemia, Vacuum delivery   DOI: 10.3126/jnhrc.v7i1.2275 Journal of Nepal Health Research Council Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009 April 25-28

scholarly journals Fast-track pathway for elective caesarean section: a quality improvement initiative to promote day 1 discharge

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Joanne Bowden ◽  
William Dooley ◽  
Jennifer Hanrahan ◽  
Chidimma Kanu ◽  
Suni Halder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Breast Feeding ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Physiological State ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Likert Scale ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Maternity Unit ◽  
Low Risk Women

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aims to improve perioperative care, hasten recovery to the normal physiological state and shorten length of stay (LoS). There is evidence that ERAS programmes following elective caesarean section (ELCS) confer benefit through faster return to physiological state and reduced LoS for mother and baby. Baseline audit of ELCS in 2013 revealed a mean LoS of 3 days. We piloted an ERAS discharge pathway promoting day 2 discharge, which rose from 5.0% to 40.2%. 19.2% of women went home on day 1. Many women fed back that they would prefer day 1 discharge. We hypothesised that a day 1 discharge pathway for low-risk women could benefit both women and services at our maternity unit. From October 2015, we developed a ‘fast-track pathway’ (FTP) using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach. Between October 2015 and April 2016, we prospectively audited clinical outcomes, LoS and maternal satisfaction from all women placed on the FTP. We held regular multidisciplinary team meetings to allow contemporaneous analysis. Satisfaction was analysed by Likert scale at postoperative surveys. Women were identified in antenatal clinic after meeting predefined low-risk criteria. 27.3% of women (n=131/479) delivering by ELCS entered the FTP. 76.2% of women on the FTP were discharged on day 1. Mean LoS fell to 1.31 days. 94.2% of women who established breast feeding at day 1 were still breast feeding at 7 days. Overall satisfaction at day 7 was 4.71 on a 5-point Likert scale. 73.1% of women reported good pain control. Additional financial savings are estimated at £99 886 annually. There were no related cases of readmission. Day 1 discharge after ELCS is safe and acceptable in carefully selected, low-risk women and has high satisfaction. There may be resultant financial savings and improved flow through a maternity unit with no detected adverse effect on breast feeding, maternal morbidity or postnatal readmissions.

scholarly journals Postpartum femoral neuropathy: managing the next pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e232967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Rowland ◽  
Daniel Kane ◽  
Maeve Eogan
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Primiparous Woman ◽  
Limb Weakness ◽  
Femoral Neuropathy ◽  
Lower Limb Weakness ◽  
Spontaneous Labour

A 34-year-old primiparous woman presented in spontaneous labour and had an unassisted vaginal birth of a 3.5 kg infant. Postnatally, the patient experienced lower limb weakness and was unable to mobilise unassisted. A diagnosis of postpartum femoral neuropathy was made. Full recovery of normal motor function was not achieved until 5 months postpartum. She returned in her next pregnancy, seeking advice on how to avoid this complication from reoccurring. It was decided that an elective caesarean section was an appropriate mode of delivery, which she underwent at 39 weeks without complication and without recurrence of the femoral neuropathy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document