The Impact of Immediate Breast Reconstruction on the Technical Delivery of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy

2011 ◽  
Vol s2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany Mohammed Abdel Aziz ◽  
Atef Youssef Reyad ◽  
Tarek Hussein Kamel ◽  
Ahmed Hassan Abdel Aziz ◽  
Amit Bahl
Author(s):  
Sabin B. Motwani ◽  
Eric A. Strom ◽  
Naomi R. Schechter ◽  
Charles E. Butler ◽  
Gordon K. Lee ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1349-1352
Author(s):  
Tuan Tran ◽  
Tu Tran ◽  
Duncan Miles ◽  
Michael Hill ◽  
Sharon S. Lum

We sought to determine the differences in surgical outcomes associated with adjuvant radiation versus no radiation in patients undergoing concurrent breast oncologic and reconstructive operations. A retrospective review of patients who underwent combined oncologic and plastic surgeries for breast diseases from January 2005 to June 2010 was compared for demographic factors and outcomes by receipt of radiation therapy. During the study period, 175 patients were identified; 25.7 per cent received radiation therapy. Mean patient age was 51 years and median follow-up was 355 days. Overall, 80.2 per cent of patients underwent mastectomy; 19.8 per cent partial mastectomy; 42.1 per cent autologous tissue reconstruction; and 54.8 per cent implant-based reconstruction. There were no significant differences between radiated and nonradiated patients in rates of overall or oncoplastic-specific complications. Lymphedema was the only complication seen more frequently in the radiated arm ( P = 0.03). In our series of carefully selected patients undergoing a variety of reconstructive techniques for repair of partial or total mastectomy defects, radiation was not associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction. With careful collaboration among plastic surgeons, breast surgeons, and radiation oncologists, patients requiring breast surgery may safely be considered for reconstruction of partial or total mastectomy defects when adjuvant radiation is required.


2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 551-557
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Wood ◽  
Lisa R. David ◽  
Anthony J. Defranzo ◽  
John H. Stewart ◽  
Perry Shen ◽  
...  

Traditionally, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed at the time of mastectomy and reconstruction. However, several groups have advocated SLNB as a separate outpatient procedure before mastectomy, when immediate reconstruction is planned, to allow for complete pathologic evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of intraoperative analysis of SLNB on the reconstructive plan when performed at the same time as definitive surgery. A retrospective review was conducted of all mastectomy cases performed at a single institution between September 1998 and November 2007. Of the 747 mastectomy cases reviewed, SLNB was conducted in 344 cases, and there was immediate breast reconstruction in 193 of those cases. There were 27 (7.8%) false negative and three (0.9%) false positive intraoperative analysis of SLNB. Touch preparation analysis from the SLNB changed the reconstructive plan in four (2.1%) cases. In our experience, SLNB can be performed at the time of mastectomy with minimal impact on the reconstructive plan. A staged approach incurs significant additional expense, increases the delay in initiation of systemic therapy and the propensity of procedure-related morbidity; therefore, SLNB should not be performed as a separate procedure before definitive surgery with immediate breast reconstruction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (12) ◽  
pp. 1640-1648
Author(s):  
E. Heeg ◽  
J. X. Harmeling ◽  
B. E. Becherer ◽  
P. J. Marang‐van de Mheen ◽  
M. T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Cordeiro ◽  
Claudia R. Albornoz ◽  
Beryl McCormick ◽  
Qunying Hu ◽  
Kimberly Van Zee

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-203
Author(s):  
M Wilson ◽  
M Dordea ◽  
A Light ◽  
MP Serra ◽  
SR Aspinall

Introduction Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is performed increasingly following mastectomy for breast cancer. The literature suggests higher reconstructive failure and poorer cosmesis in the subgroup of patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) following IBR. We set out to determine the accuracy of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion in predicting PMRT. Methods Preoperative MDT discussions were recorded prospectively over a 12-month period (from February 2011) in a symptomatic breast unit. The estimated need for PMRT was stratified into ‘PMRT not required’, ‘PMRT possibly required’, ‘PMRT probably required’ and ‘PMRT required’ groups. Results Of 156 referrals included in the study, 76 patients (49%) underwent mastectomy: 61 simple mastectomy, 10 skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) and delayed-immediate breast reconstruction, 3 SSM and implant-based IBR, and 2 mastectomy IBR with an autologous flap. The IBR rate was therefore 19.7%. The proportion of patients who received PMRT was 14% (3/21) in the ‘PMRT not required’, 30% (7/23) in the ‘PMRT possibly required’, 65% (9/14) in the ‘PMRT probably required’ and 94% (17/18) in the ‘PMRT required’ groups. Assigning a linear numerical score (1–4) to these groups (higher score representing greater likelihood of receiving PMRT), the predicted need for PMRT correlated with the proportion of patients who ultimately received PMRT (linear regression r2=0.98, p=0.01). Conclusions This study has examined the factors influencing MDT discussions regarding IBR, demonstrating that the MDT is reasonably accurate at predicting need for PMRT. Whether such accuracy is clinically adequate and/or reproducible across units is debatable.


Author(s):  
Dora Danko ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Feifei Geng ◽  
Theresa W Gillespie

Abstract Background The literature examining decision-making related to treatment and reconstruction for women with breast cancer has established that patient, clinical, and facility factors all play a role. Objectives Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), determine how patient, clinical, and facility factors influence: 1) the receipt of immediate breast reconstruction; and 2) the type of immediate breast reconstruction received (implant-based, autologous, or a combination). Methods A total of 638,772 female patients with TIS-T3, N0-N1, M0 breast cancers were identified in the NCDB from 2004-2017 who received immediate reconstruction following mastectomy. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to identify characteristics associated with immediate breast reconstruction and type of reconstruction. Results Immediate breast reconstruction was more frequently associated with patients of white race, younger age, with private insurance, with lesser comorbidities, who resided in zip-codes with higher median incomes or higher rate of high-school graduation, in urban areas, with Tis-T2 disease, or with <4 lymph node involvement (all odds ratios (OR) > 1.1). Negative predictors of immediate breast reconstruction were insurance status with Medicaid, Medicare, other government insurance, and none or unknown insurance (all ORs <0.79). Implant-based reconstruction was associated with non-black race, uninsured status, completion of higher education, undifferentiated disease, and stage T0 disease (all ORs >1.10). Conclusions These findings confirm some previous studies on what patient, clinical, and facility factors affect decision making, but also raise new questions that relate to the impact of third-party payor on receipt and type of reconstruction post-mastectomy for breast cancer.


The Breast ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong-Tae Lee ◽  
Goo-Hyun Mun ◽  
So-Young Lim ◽  
Jai-Kyong Pyon ◽  
Kap-Sung Oh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document