Symmetry and the Direct Stiffness Method in Structural Analysis: A Formulation based on Group Theory

Author(s):  
A. Zingoni ◽  
M.N. Pavlovic ◽  
G.M. Zlokovic
AIAA Journal ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 821-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT E. JONES

1966 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. Gerstenkorn ◽  
A. S. Kobayashi ◽  
C. A. Wiederhielm ◽  
R. F. Rushmer

The direct stiffness method is used to analyze the structural response of the cross section of an arteriole which is both heterogeneous and nonlinear in terms of structural response. A typical segment of the cross section is represented by an assembly of triangular elements. The stiffness matrix and strain-displacement relationships are then derived in terms of polar coordinates for a triangular plate element. Viscoelasticity is included in this structural analysis by using a piecewise linear approach. Stress-time and displacement-time data are presented for two typical cross sections of the arteriole. These results reveal special properties of a heterogeneous structure which is undergoing viscoelastic deformations.


1971 ◽  
Vol 97 (9) ◽  
pp. 2299-2314 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Stricklin ◽  
Walter E. Haisler ◽  
Walter A. Von Riesemann

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ersilio Tushaj ◽  
Niko Lako ◽  
Fatjon Saliu

The optimal problem in the structural design is an important issue in the engineering design. Various authors have analyzed the optimization of steel structures using algorithmic approaches. These techniques are generally grouped in deterministic or meta-heuristic techniques. From the introduction of structural optimization in the 1960’ up to now, various methods have been proposed. A genetic algorithm, is built and applied in this study using MatLab soft R2017a to a crossed beams system. The structural analysis is done with the direct stiffness method with constraints verification based on EuroCode 3:2005 criteria. Results are reported in the study.


1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama Moselhi

This paper presents a new method for critical path (CPM) scheduling that optimizes project duration in order to minimize the project total cost. In addition, the method could be used to produce constrained schedules that accommodate contractual completion dates of projects and their milestones. The proposed method is based on the well-known "direct stiffness method" for structural analysis. The method establishes a complete analogy between the structural analysis problem with imposed support settlement and that of project scheduling with imposed target completion date. The project CPM network is replaced by an equivalent structure. The equivalence conditions are established such that when the equivalent structure is compressed by an imposed displacement equal to the schedule compression, the sum of all member forces represents the additional cost required to achieve such compression. To enable a comparison with the currently used methods, an example application from the literature is analyzed using the proposed method. The results are in close agreement with those obtained using current techniques. In addition, the proposed method has some interesting features: (i) it is flexible, providing a trade-off between required accuracy and computational effort, (ii) it is capable of providing solutions to CPM networks where dynamic programming may not be directly applicable, and (iii) it could be extended to treat other problems including the impact of delays and disruptions on schedule and budget of construction projects. Key words: construction scheduling, time–cost trade-off, project cost optimization, scheduling with constraints, project acceleration.


1972 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Booker ◽  
K. H. Huebner

The finite element method of lubrication analysis is presented for the novice from a viewpoint closely analogous to that of the familiar direct stiffness method of structural analysis. The lubricant film is seen as a system of component elements interconnected at nodal points where flows are summed and pressures (but not necessarily thicknesses, viscosities, or densities) are equated. System properties are deduced from component properties and connections. Detailed equations needed for solution of practical problems are given in Appendices and their use is illustrated in Examples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document