Nonlinear Analysis of Interlocking Mortarless Block Masonry Systems using the Finite Element Method

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A.M. Thanoon ◽  
A.H. Alwathaf ◽  
J. Noorzaei ◽  
M.S. Jaafar ◽  
M.R. Abdulkadir
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Nonlinear Analysis ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Element Method

Nonlinear Analysis of Plates and Shells by the Incremental Procedure Using a Mixed Model of the Finite Element Method

1980 ◽  
Vol 23 (186) ◽  
pp. 1945-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi WADA ◽  
Yoshihiro TAKI ◽  
Tohsaku TAKAMURA ◽  
Tohru NISHIMURA
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Nonlinear Analysis ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Plates And Shells ◽  
Element Method

Nonlinear analysis of composite bridges by the finite element method

1991 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1151-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. Lin ◽  
M. Fafard ◽  
D. Beaulieu ◽  
B. Massicotte
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Nonlinear Analysis ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Composite Bridges ◽  
Element Method

scholarly journals Comparison of Nonlinear Analysis Algorithms for Two Typical Asphalt Pavement Analysis Programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-251
Author(s):  
Xin Jiang ◽  
Kang Yao ◽  
Hanyan Gu ◽  
Zhenkun Li ◽  
Yanjun Qiu
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Nonlinear Analysis ◽  
Resilient Modulus ◽  
Asphalt Pavement ◽  
Layered System ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Mechanical Responses ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Element Method

Two representative programs, MICH-PAVE and KENLAYER, are selected and compared to many key aspects of their analysis algorithms to achieve an in-depth understanding of the features of the Finite Element Method and elastic layered system theory in nonlinear material analysis of the structure of asphalt pavement. Furthermore, by conducting a case study, the impact of using different analysis methods on the calculation results is presented. Moreover, the feasibility of the equivalent resilient modulus obtained by the Finite Element Method is discussed. The results show that the difference among the nonlinear analysis algorithms used by the two software packages is mainly reflected in the determination of the initial resilient modulus, the stress correction, and the convergence condition. Besides, the Finite Element Method could consider the variation of the resilient modulus induced by the change in the stress condition in both the radial and the depth directions simultaneously. In contrast, the theory of the elastic layered system only considers the dependence of the resilient modulus on the stress in the depth direction. Additionally, the use of diverse nonlinear analysis methods has different levels of impact on mechanical responses. Finally, the equivalent resilient modulus obtained by nonlinear analysis can be used to calculate mechanical responses of pavement structure except the surface deflection in a linear analysis.

Plasticity Calculation of Plates Using Layered Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 825 ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Fiedler ◽  
Tomáš Koudelka
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Nonlinear Analysis ◽  
Yield Criterion ◽  
Plasticity Model ◽  
Plastic Yielding ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Layered Model ◽  
Plate Elements ◽  
Element Method

A layered model is used for nonlinear analysis of plates. Calculation is performed using DKT plate elements and considering plastic yielding of layers with the use of double Drucker-Prager yield criterion model for concrete and J2 plasticity model for reinforcement. Computation is done by the SIFEL solver using the Finite Element Method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document