AUSM-Based High-Order Solution for Euler Equations

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1096-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo L. Scandaliato ◽  
Meng-Sing Liou

AbstractIn this paper we demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of combining the advection upwind splitting method (AUSM), specifically AUSM+-UP, with high-order upwind-biased interpolation procedures, the weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO-JS) scheme and its variations, and the monotonicity preserving (MP) scheme, for solving the Euler equations. MP is found to be more effective than the three WENO variations studied. AUSM+-UP is also shown to be free of the so-called “carbuncle” phenomenon with the high-order interpolation. The characteristic variables are preferred for interpolation after comparing the results using primitive and conservative variables, even though they require additional matrix-vector operations. Results using the Roe flux with an entropy fix and the Lax-Friedrichs approximate Riemann solvers are also included for comparison. In addition, four reflective boundary condition implementations are compared for their effects on residual convergence and solution accuracy. Finally, a measure for quantifying the efficiency of obtaining high order solutions is proposed; the measure reveals that a maximum return is reached after which no improvement in accuracy is possible for a given grid size.

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 324-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Georg Fuchs ◽  
Andrew D. McMurry ◽  
Siddhartha Mishra ◽  
Nils Henrik Risebro ◽  
Knut Waagan

AbstractWe design stable and high-order accurate finite volume schemes for the ideal MHD equations in multi-dimensions. We obtain excellent numerical stability due to some new elements in the algorithm. The schemes are based on three- and five-wave approximate Riemann solvers of the HLL-type, with the novelty that we allow a varying normal magnetic field. This is achieved by considering the semi-conservative Godunov-Powell form of the MHD equations. We show that it is important to discretize the Godunov-Powell source term in the right way, and that the HLL-type solvers naturally provide a stable upwind discretization. Second-order versions of the ENO- and WENO-type reconstructions are proposed, together with precise modifications necessary to preserve positive pressure and density. Extending the discrete source term to second order while maintaining stability requires non-standard techniques, which we present. The first- and second-order schemes are tested on a suite of numerical experiments demonstrating impressive numerical resolution as well as stability, even on very fine meshes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (S274) ◽  
pp. 479-481
Author(s):  
T. Rembiasz ◽  
M. Obergaulinger ◽  
M. Angel Aloy ◽  
P. Cerdá-Durán ◽  
E. Müller

AbstractWe present an assessment of the accuracy of a recently developed MHD code used to study hydromagnetic flows in supernovae and related events. The code, based on the constrained transport formulation, incorporates unprecedented ultra-high-order methods (up to 9th order) for the reconstruction and the most accurate approximate Riemann solvers. We estimate the numerical resistivity of these schemes in tearing instability simulations.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1113
Author(s):  
Isaías Alonso-Mallo ◽  
Ana M. Portillo

The initial boundary-value problem associated to a semilinear wave equation with time-dependent boundary values was approximated by using the method of lines. Time integration is achieved by means of an explicit time method obtained from an arbitrarily high-order splitting scheme. We propose a technique to incorporate the boundary values that is more accurate than the one obtained in the standard way, which is clearly seen in the numerical experiments. We prove the consistency and convergence, with the same order of the splitting method, of the full discretization carried out with this technique. Although we performed mathematical analysis under the hypothesis that the source term was Lipschitz-continuous, numerical experiments show that this technique works in more general cases.


2014 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 432-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Puri ◽  
Prabhu Ramachandran

1988 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saul Abarbanel ◽  
Ajay Kumar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document