scholarly journals Preference Intensity in Positional Voting

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (08) ◽  
pp. 727-738
Author(s):  
Esther Mata-Pérez ◽  
Annick Laruelle ◽  
Ricardo Martínez ◽  
Giovanni Ponti
2021 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-351
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Anderson ◽  
Brian Camara ◽  
John Pike

1976 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold de Bock

In a one-sided presidential election, in-state election poll reports may cause the underdog to suffer a loss in preference intensity and turnout motivation.


1974 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. G. Upton ◽  
D. Brook
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-333
Author(s):  
Christopher R. H. Hanusa
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireya Solís

What explains the pattern of selective business interest in preferential trade agreements (PTAs) with active campaigning for and utilization of tariff preferences for some trade agreements, but not others? Under what conditions can business advocates of PTA policy mount an effective lobbying campaign to influence policy outcomes (i.e., shaping decisions onwhoto negotiate with andwhatto negotiate about)? These are important questions given that analyses of Asian PTAs frequently assign a negligible role to business interests either out of apathy or lobbying weakness. To understand the pattern of selective business lobbying for PTAs, I develop a theoretical model with three main independent variables: venue selection, preference intensity, and advocacy effectiveness, and apply it to the case of Japan to test its usefulness. My model shows that the conditions for effective business PTA campaigning are exacting: loss avoidance, high technical expertise, and influence-seeking strategies that maximize access opportunities given institutional constraints. And yet when these factors align, business interests do influence PTA outcomes. My research shows that the current trend to characterize the agency of PTA proliferation as either state-led or business-driven needs to be re-examined as it is more useful to think about state-society constellations in favor or against PTAs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 548-586
Author(s):  
Kei Kawai ◽  
Yuta Toyama ◽  
Yasutora Watanabe

We study how voter turnout affects the aggregation of preferences in elections. Under voluntary voting, election outcomes disproportionately aggregate the preferences of voters with low voting cost and high preference intensity. We show identification of the correlation structure among preferences, costs, and perceptions of voting efficacy, and explore how the correlation affects preference aggregation. Using 2004 US presidential election data, we find that young, low-income, less-educated, and minority voters are underrepresented. All of these groups tend to prefer Democrats, except for the less educated. Democrats would have won the majority of the electoral votes if all eligible voters had turned out. (JEL D12, D72)


2021 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 105199
Author(s):  
Georgios Gerasimou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document