Flight Control Maintenance Diagnostic System (FCMDS) Field Testing Results and Future Plans

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Funk ◽  
John Meisner ◽  
Paul Bursch ◽  
Kathleen Radke

Author(s):  
David C. Brabb ◽  
Kenneth L. Martin ◽  
Anand R. Vithani ◽  
Monique F. Stewart ◽  
S. K. Punwani

For years, American freight railroads have attempted to eliminate freight train crew injuries when applying and releasing freight car hand brakes. Currently, a person has to crank a handle or turn a wheel while in ergonomically awkward positions to apply a hand brake. If the operator slips or the brake’s mechanisms slip, injuries occur. Also, there are inherent safety issues with the climbing of ladders or steps to operate the brake and the need for going in-between cars to access the brakes. Additionally, today’s hand brakes are applied manually to varying degrees because there is no indicator to tell the crew that the hand brake is fully applied. Many times the hand brake is over applied and becomes damaged. Moreover, a hand brake that is not released upon train movement leads to wheel flats that damage the car, lading, and the track. Wheel set replacement is one of the most costly remediation activities on the railroad and damaged track adversely affects equipment and operations. With the objective of reducing or completely eliminating the issues mentioned above, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has sponsored the development of an ‘Electrically Driven Set & Release Hand Brake’ (EDHB). Under this effort, Sharma & Associates, Inc. (SA) has conducted research into related concepts/products conceptualized and evaluated different arrangements selected a promising concept and developed a prototype. Functional laboratory demonstration tests have been conducted on the prototype. Future plans include working with the industry in developing and implementing performance and testing specifications for the EDHB, and validating the design through lab and field-testing.



2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny J. Taasevigen ◽  
Michael R. Brambley ◽  
Yunzhi Huang ◽  
Robert G. Lutes ◽  
Spencer P. Gilbride




Author(s):  
Rahmat A. Shoureshi ◽  
Su-Wook Lim ◽  
Benny Sarusi

Overhead electric transmission lines are subjected to many natural hazards. Presently, the strength and remaining life of the transmission lines have primarily been determined by visual inspection. This paper presents results of our research, which has been focused on the feasibility analysis, and the development of an intelligent monitoring and integrity assessment system without the need for de-energizing or disassembly of transmission lines. This mechatronic system combines advances in electronics, mechanical system design, embedded signal processing and neural networks for signature analysis and feature extraction to create a smart diagnostic system for real-time operation. This paper also presents results from the actual field-testing of the Electromagnetic-Acoustic-Transducer (EMAT) monitoring system from utility companies. The utility companies are currently utilizing the EMAT to identify status of the overhead transmission lines without de-energizing and disassembly of their tower structures.



Author(s):  
P.M. Bursch ◽  
J.W. Meisner ◽  
R. McAfoos ◽  
J.B. Schroeder


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. de Boer ◽  
Karel Hurts

Abstract. Automation surprise (AS) has often been associated with aviation safety incidents. Although numerous laboratory studies have been conducted, few data are available from routine flight operations. A survey among a representative sample of 200 Dutch airline pilots was used to determine the prevalence of AS and the severity of its consequences, and to test some of the factors leading to AS. Results show that AS is a relatively widespread phenomenon that occurs three times per year per pilot on average but rarely has serious consequences. In less than 10% of the AS cases that were reviewed, an undesired aircraft state was induced. Reportable occurrences are estimated to occur only once every 1–3 years per pilot. Factors leading to a higher prevalence of AS include less flying experience, increasing complexity of the flight control mode, and flight duty periods of over 8 hr. It is concluded that AS is a manifestation of system and interface complexity rather than cognitive errors.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document