scholarly journals Foreign Bodies on the Path of Nutrition: Retrospective Evaluation of Our Clinical Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Mustafa Zanyar Akkuzu ◽  
Orhan Sezgin ◽  
Serkan Yaraş ◽  
Osman Özdoğan ◽  
Enver Üçbilek ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 961-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Chatzinikolaou ◽  
Hend Hanna ◽  
Linda Graviss ◽  
Gassan Chaiban ◽  
Cheryl Perego ◽  
...  

AbstractIn this retrospective evaluation of the 4-year clinical use of minocycline and rifampin-impregnated catheters in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patients, we report low risk of development of staphylococcal resistance to the antibiotics coating the catheters and efficacy in preventing primary staphylococcal bloodstream infections.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 671-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Faruk Ozguner ◽  
B. Ilker Buyukyavuz ◽  
Cagri Savas ◽  
M. Sunay Yavuz ◽  
Huseyin Okutan

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-426
Author(s):  
Chew Shiun Chuen ◽  
Nik Adilah Nik Othman

Paediatric patient with a foreign body in the ear may be present primarily to primary care physician or being referred to the otorhinolaryngology (ORL) clinic. The foreign bodies vary from organic to inorganic material with different sizes and shapes. Removal of foreign body in the ear canal requires adequate clinical experience as well as proper clinical instruments and cooperative clinical staff. Throughout the years, many clinical instruments and devices have been designed and proven to able to facilitate a smooth procedure with high success rates. However, an agitated child may be uncooperative and the increase in the number of attempts will result in injury of the ear canal or displacement of foreign body to the middle ear. Thus, clinical experience is essential and the doubtful cases are preferably to be performed under general anaesthesia to prevent complications. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.18(2) 2019 p.423-426


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Qing Bai ◽  
Lin Yao ◽  
Xu-Xia Meng ◽  
Yun-Xiao Wang ◽  
Da-Bo Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Leah Soderman ◽  
Kenneth R. Harkin

ABSTRACT Infection with the stomach worm Physaloptera spp. in dogs can cause chronic vomiting, although the diagnosis is often difficult owing to a low worm burden, single-sex infections, a failure to produce ova, or ova that are of greater density than solutions routinely used for qualitative fecal flotation. A retrospective evaluation was performed of 27 dogs that had gastric Physaloptera spp. infection confirmed endoscopically. In 23 of 27 dogs (85.2%), chronic vomiting was the chief complaint, and Physaloptera was an incidental finding in 3 dogs with esophageal or gastric foreign bodies. The worm burden was low (1–3 worms) in 21 dogs (77.8%), but 2 dogs were infected with large numbers (>50 worms). Prior therapy with routine doses of anthelmintics was ineffective in eight dogs prior to endoscopy. A higher dose and longer duration of fenbendazole in combination with pyrantel pamoate is recommended for treatment of suspected or confirmed infections. Reinfection is common in some dogs and should not be viewed as treatment failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document