scholarly journals A qualitative study of medical student socialization in Malawi\'s College of Medicine: Preclinical training and identity

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Wendland ◽  
C Bandawe
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 692-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina M. Gonzalez ◽  
Maria L. Deno ◽  
Emily Kintzer ◽  
Paul R. Marantz ◽  
Monica L. Lypson ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1147-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Block ◽  
Melissa Morgan-Gouveia ◽  
Rachel B. Levine ◽  
Danelle Cayea

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian S. Chua ◽  
Alyssa L. Bogetz

Patient feedback has increasingly become part of medical students’ training and formative assessment. We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups to explore students’ experiences soliciting patient feedback, including the benefits, challenges, and potential strategies to obtain it. Fifteen medical students participated. Thematic analysis revealed students’ (1) discomfort soliciting feedback and concern of being viewed as self-serving; (2) concerns about eroding patient trust; (3) indifference to nonspecific, positive feedback; and (4) belief that informally solicited feedback is most helpful for their learning. Strategies for soliciting more useful patient feedback included (1) team-based solicitation, (2) empowering patients as teachers, and (3) development of feedback instruments that allow patients to comment on specific student-identified learning goals. Solicitation of patient feedback is challenging for medical students and provokes discomfort. Strategies to integrate patient feedback into medical student training and assessment must attend to students’ needs so the value of patient feedback can be realized.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Gopaul

Purpose Although the production of a dissertation and the transition to an independent researcher undergird the outcomes of doctoral education, this study aims to emphasize issues of inequality in doctoral study through the use of Bourdieu’s (1977, 1986) concepts of cultural capital and field. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study with 15 doctoral students in Engineering and in Philosophy revealed that activities in doctoral study that tend to socialize students possess value, given the conventions of various contexts or social spaces related to academe. Findings Doctoral students who attain particular accomplishments experience doctoral study in ways that suggest that doctoral study is a system of conventions and norms that imbue particular activities with value, which then impact students’ doctoral education experiences. Originality/value Inequality is tied to students’ portfolio of achievements, as the value of these achievements suggests differential socialization experiences, such that different students learn about the norms and practices within doctoral study in different ways.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document