scholarly journals Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite

2018 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
M Ghavam ◽  
M Naeemi ◽  
SS Hashemikamangar ◽  
H Ebrahimi ◽  
MJ Kharazifard
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Composite Effect ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Effect of surface treatments on push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to fiber posts

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr M. Elnaghy ◽  
Ayman Mandorah ◽  
Ali H. Hassan ◽  
Alaa Elshazli ◽  
Shaymaa Elsaka
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
The Other ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Abstract Background To evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine (BD) and white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) to fiber posts. Methods Two brands of fiber posts were used: Reblida post; RP and RelyX post; RX. Each type of post (n = 80/group) was divided into four groups (n = 20/group) and exposed to surface treatment as follows: Control (no treatment), sandblasting (SB), hydrofluoric acid (HF), and TiF4 4 wt/v%. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups (n = 10/subgroup) based on the type of CSCs used as follows: Subgroup A: BD and Subgroup B: WMTA. Push-out bond strength of BD and WMTA to glass fiber posts was assessed. Data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. A Weibull analysis was performed on the push-out bond strength data. Results BD showed higher bond strength than WMTA (P < 0.001). The push-out bond strength for posts treated with TiF4 4 wt/v% showed greater bond strength than the other surface treatments (P < 0.05). The BD/RP-TiF4 4 wt/v% showed the greater characteristic bond strength (σ0) (15.93) compared with the other groups. Surface treatments modified the surface topography of glass fiber posts. Conclusions The BD/RP-TiF4 4 wt/v% showed greater bond strength compared with the other groups. The TiF4 4 wt/v% surface treatment enhanced the bond strength of BD and WMTA to glass fiber posts than the other treatments. Surface treatment of fiber post with TiF4 4 wt/v% could be used to improve the bond strength with calcium silicate-based cements.

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Treatment and Storage Time on Immediate Repair Bond Strength Durability of Methacrylate- and Ormocer-Based Bulk Fill Resin Composites

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 8308
Author(s):  
Farid S. El-Askary ◽  
Sara A. Botros ◽  
Mutlu Özcan
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Oxygen Inhibition ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment and storage time on immediate repair bond durability of methacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk fill composites. In total, 265 discs were divided into 32 groups (n = 8/group) according to: (1) Material: X-tra fil and Admira Fusion X-tra; (2) Surface treatment: oxygen inhibition; matrix; Futurabond M+; Silane/Futurabond M+; Admira Bond; Silane/Admira Bond; ceramic repair system; and Silane/Cimara bond; and (3) Storage time: 24 h and 6 months. Each disc received three micro-cylinders from the same material. Specimens were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing either at 24 h or 6 months. Data were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey’s test/Student t-test (p = 0.05). All experimental factors had significant effect on bond strength (p < 0.0001). Drop in bond strength was noticed in both materials after six months (p < 0.05), except for Admira Fusion X-tra treated with silane/cimara adhesive (p = 0.860). Both materials showed insignificant values with Admira bond either at 24 h or 6 months (p = 0.275 and p = 0.060, respectively). For other treatments, X-tra fil showed significantly higher values at 24 h and 6 months (p < 0.05). Ceramic repair system can be used to immediately repair both methacrylate- and ormocer-based composites.

Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 957-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balqees S. Almufleh ◽  
Khalil I. Aleisa ◽  
Steven M. Morgano
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Zirconium Oxide ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Effect of surface treatment on the bond strength between yttria partially stabilized zirconia ceramics and resin cement

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz R. Menani ◽  
Ian A.G.K.M. Farhat ◽  
Rodrigo Tiossi ◽  
Ricardo F. Ribeiro ◽  
Antonio C. Guastaldi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Stabilized Zirconia ◽  
Zirconia Ceramics ◽  
Partially Stabilized Zirconia ◽  
Yttria Partially Stabilized Zirconia ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
P SCHMAGE ◽  
J SOHN ◽  
M OZCAN ◽  
I NERGIZ
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive

LASER THERAPY ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazanin Kiomarsi ◽  
Melika Espahbodi ◽  
Nasim Chiniforush ◽  
Mohammad Javd Karazifard ◽  
Sedighe Sadat Hashemi Kamangar
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Composite Effect ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Effect Of Surface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document