Inter-Korean relations and the challenge of North-East Asian regional security

2013 ◽  
pp. 143-153
Author(s):  
John Swenson-Wright
1997 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 579
Author(s):  
William T. Tow ◽  
Takashi Inoguchi ◽  
Grant B. Stillman

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viatcheslav Gavrilov ◽  
Alexandra Kripakova

1982 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. F. W. Hicham ◽  
Amphan Kijngam ◽  
B. F. J. Manly

During the past decade, archaeological research in north-east Thailand has concentrated on the excavation of individual sites. Of these, the best known are Non Nok Tha (Bayard 1971) and Ban Chiang (Gorman and Charoenwongsa 1976). Both are relatively small occupation and burial sites, covering c. 1 ha and 3.5 ha respectively.There have been several claims for an unexpectedly early bronze-working tradition in the area, and of the inception of iron technology during the second millennium BC. Biological remains from these sites reveal cultivation of rice and maintenance of domestic herds of cattle, pig and water buffalo (Gorman and Charoenwongsa 1976). While the recent surge of prehistoric research here and in adjacent areas has clearly demonstrated the presence of a south-east Asian bronze working tradition of some antiquity (Ha Van Tan 1980), the establishment of a chronological framework and of the settlement pattern in the area are in their infancy.As part of the Thai Government's North-east Thailand Archaeological Project, steps were taken in 1980–81 to expand our knowledge of the Ban Chiang culture. During the 1980 dry season, Higham and Kijngam co-directed two intensive field surveys.


2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhu P. Mohapatra

Recent historiography attempts increasingly to move beyond Eurocentrism. In the field of migration, Adam McKeown's article is a fine example of an attempt to put global migration in a non-Eurocentric perspective. Perhaps its most acute insight is in putting the paradigmatic European migration flows to the Americas in the nineteenth century at par with the mainly intra Asian (south/south-east Asian and north-east Asian) migration flows. McKeown's main target of attack is the unabashed “Euro-centrism” (or rather the “North Atlantic centrism”) of much of the migration literature on the so called age of mass migration. Eurocentrism appears, at least in the way that McKeown presents it, as a set of three interrelated propositions.


2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Kim ◽  
J. S. Yeo ◽  
C. B. Choi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document