Child Abuse and Family Assessment

Author(s):  
WILLIAM N FRIEDRICH ◽  
ERNA OLAFSON ◽  
LISA CONNELLY
1988 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 116-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Irving ◽  
Alan Carr ◽  
George Gawlinski ◽  
Dermot McDonnell

This paper describes the contribution of an occupational therapist to a comprehensive assessment programme for families with physically abused children. Initially, a brief outline of the entire programme is set out. In the light of this, an approach to residential family assessment, pioneered by occupational therapy in the West Norfolk and Wisbech health district, is described in detail.


2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-203
Author(s):  
Penny Lewis†

Abstract. From my training with Marian Chace came much of the roots of my employment of dance therapy in my work. The use of empathic movement reflection assisted me in the development of the technique of somatic countertransference ( Lewis, 1984 , 1988 , 1992 ) and in the choreography of the symbiotic phase in object relations ( Lewis, 1983 , 1987a , 1988 , 1990 , 1992 ). Marian provided the foundation for assistance in separation and individuation through the use of techniques which stimulated skin (body) and external (kinespheric) boundary formation. Reciprocal embodied response and the use of thematic imaginal improvisations provided the foundation for the embodied personification of intrapsychic phenomena such as the internalized patterns, inner survival mechanisms, addictions, and the inner child. Chace’s model assisted in the development of structures for the remembering, re-experiencing, and healing of child abuse as well as the rechoreography of object relations. Finally, Marian Chace’s use of synchronistic group postural rhythmic body action provided access to the transformative power of ritual in higher stages of individuation and spiritual consciousness.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Cook

Abstract. In family systems, it is possible for one to put oneself at risk by eliciting aversive, high-risk behaviors from others ( Cook, Kenny, & Goldstein, 1991 ). Consequently, it is desirable that family assessments should clarify the direction of effects when evaluating family dynamics. In this paper a new method of family assessment will be presented that identifies bidirectional influence processes in family relationships. Based on the Social Relations Model (SRM: Kenny & La Voie, 1984 ), the SRM Family Assessment provides information about the give and take of family dynamics at three levels of analysis: group, individual, and dyad. The method will be briefly illustrated by the assessment of a family from the PIER Program, a randomized clinical trial of an intervention to prevent the onset of psychosis in high-risk young people.


Psychotherapy ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Arcaya ◽  
Gwendolyn L. Gerber
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 791-791
Author(s):  
Gary B. Melton
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document