Sources for the Visually Handicapped

Energy Guide ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155-158
Author(s):  
Virginia Bemis
Keyword(s):  
1979 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
Cheri L. Florance ◽  
Judith O’Keefe

A modification of the Paired-Stimuli Parent Program (Florance, 1977) was adapted for the treatment of articulatory errors of visually handicapped children. Blind high school students served as clinical aides. A discussion of treatment methodology, and the results of administrating the program to 32 children, including a two-year follow-up evaluation to measure permanence of behavior change, is presented.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bayram TEMUR ◽  
Ersin ARSLAN ◽  
Mahmut AKTI ◽  
Israfil ASLAN
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 1745-1746
Author(s):  
Masamitsu Watanabe ◽  
Yoshinori Takeuchi ◽  
Tetsuya Matsumoto ◽  
Hiroaki Kudo ◽  
Noboru Ohnishi
Keyword(s):  

1976 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
Friedericka Mayers

Social work training oriented specifically toward the visually handicapped is not widely available in schools of social work, and it is consequently the responsibility of rehabilitative agencies to provide such training programs. A fieldwork program at an unidentified state center for the visually handicapped is described under the headings of seven “themes” or dimensions of training.


1990 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 218-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Abaglo ◽  
J. Downing

Fifty-one adolescents and adults with a variety of visual impairments were interviewed to determine their preference for different labels used to describe them. Participants were asked to choose among labels that state the disability before the person (“the visually handicapped person”) and labels that state the person before the disability (“the person with a visual impairment”). Results showed no statistically significant preference. Reasons provided by participants for their preference were characterized and presented thematically. The importance of stressing abilities and needs to be treated as normal were the most common reasons given by the participants for their selections. Participants who chose the person-first labels cited these reasons more often than those who chose the disability-first labels.


1971 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank L. Franks ◽  
Richard M. Baird
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document