Reflective practices in a volunteer community sport coach training programme

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-63
Author(s):  
Dorien Brosens ◽  
Hebe Schaillée ◽  
Marc Theeboom ◽  
Pieter Debognies
Author(s):  
Karolyne Beets ◽  
Suki Goodman

Orientation: The evaluation of training programmes provides methodological and logistical challenges to evaluators and human resource (HR) managers. The training of executive coaches is no exception in this regard. Research purpose: The study aimed to investigate one particular aspect of the results of an executive coach training programme, and the extent to which knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired during the programme were applied in practical settings.Motivation for the study: Too little is known in South Africa about the effectiveness of training programmes, including executive coach training programmes. There is a need to demonstrate methodological approaches that would provide valid and reliable data.Research design, approach and method: The success case method (SCM) was used to guide the study, consisting first of a survey of 80 participants in the training programme, followed by eight interviews to compare successful with less successful cases of skills transfer.Main findings: All six successful coaches were applying the proximal outcomes from the training with good results, with several valuable consequences resulting from the training. Barriers to successful implementation included personal circumstances and unfulfilled expectations of the programme content.Practical/managerial implications: Aspects of the training programme that could be improved included: the buddy selection system, more individualised feedback about self-development, closer supervision, and more support from programme managers.Contribution/value-add: This evaluation contributes to the evaluation literature by providing a documented exploration of a systematic application of the SCM. It also contributes to the coach training literature by providing a systematic evaluation of a coach training intervention in South Africa.


VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 494-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Landwehr ◽  
Peter Reimer ◽  
Arno Bücker ◽  
Ansgar Berlis ◽  
Werner Weber

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-399
Author(s):  
Nancy J. Yanchus ◽  
Scott Muhs ◽  
Katerine Osatuke

Author(s):  
Niki WALLACE

It is widely agreed that in order to contribute to transitions towards sustainability, both practitioners and design itself must also transition. This paper presents findings from the first two years of transition in my Australian-based design practice. The paper explores what this transition has required of me personally, politically, and professionally, and draws on cases from my PhD. The PhD and paper are both part of an analytic auto-ethnography of my practice’s transition from ‘making greener things’ towards design for transitions. The projects discussed use ethnography, action research and reflective practices in their temporal approaches. This paper explores how slower methods such as transition design and autonomous design can extend the political reach of a design practice and discusses sacrifice and the financial stabilisation that comes from enveloping old practices within the new. The analysis presented here also reflects on my experiences practicing design for transitions and on data collected through participant engagement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document