Psychological explanations of offending behaviour 3 – Psychodynamic explanations

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-89
Author(s):  
Phil Gorman
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Syngelaki ◽  
Graeme Fairchild ◽  
Simon Moore ◽  
Stephanie van Goozen

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Soothill ◽  
Brian Francis ◽  
Rachel Fligelstone

Author(s):  
Catherine E. Hamilton ◽  
Louise Falshaw ◽  
Kevin D. Browne
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 206622032110337
Author(s):  
Matthias Van Hall ◽  
Laura Cleofa-van Der Zwet

At least 1,900 Dutch detainees are detained abroad yearly. They are housed in foreign detention because they are accused of having committed a criminal offence in a country that is not their country of residence. This study used data regarding Dutch detainees who were supervised by the International Office of the Dutch Probation Service to examine detainees’ background characteristics and their offending behaviour after returning to the Netherlands. The findings show that 23% of the Dutch detainees reoffended within 2 years of release from foreign detention. Furthermore, several background characteristics, such as their age at release from foreign detention, are related to reoffending behaviour.


Author(s):  
Charlotte Barlow

This chapter discusses the media construction of women co-offenders and their relationship with their male partner/ co-offender, using the case/ court file material as a comparative tool. It particularly considers the ways in which the women’s representation served to minimise and discredit their perspectives and defence, particularly in relation to the potential influence of their relationship with their male partner on their offending behaviour. It also considers the ways in which the women’s suggestions of coercion or coercive techniques (at varying levels) by their male partner were constructed, particularly in media discourse. In doing so, the chapter is divided into a number of key themes, such as ‘bad women’ and ‘equally bad or worse’. It is important to note that the themes apply to the women at varying levels and the extent to which they were evident in the women’s legal and media representation will be discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-159
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Jones

The research clearly indicates that the vast majority of individuals involved in the justice system who display offending behaviour have experienced trauma, victimization, or Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). Knowing this to be empirically factual raises the question, why is this not highlighted in the training of police officers, correctional officers, parole and probation officers, crown prosecutors, defence lawyers, and judges alike? An understanding of the Justice Client and their complex trauma could have important consequences on how all justice actors interact with people who experience the justice system. Knowing that these individuals were often victims long before they were offending could bring a more compassionate lens to the justice system. Having traumatic experiences is not the cause of offending, but it is often present in the offending population. The prevalence of trauma among the offending population, who themselves have often traumatized their victims, suggests a much-needed change in how police are trained to interact with Justice Clients. This paper applies the concept of Universal Precautions from first aid training in the development of practical policy to create a justice system based in compassion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document