Rehabilitation in a boundary violation from the perspective of the transgressor

Author(s):  
Terry Davis
Keyword(s):  
1993 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 455 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Alan Sroufe ◽  
Christopher Bennett ◽  
Michelle Englund ◽  
Joan Urban ◽  
Shmuel Shulman

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer P. Sarkar

In psychiatric and psychotherapeutic practice, ‘boundaries' delineate the personal and the professional roles and the differences that should characterise the interpersonal encounters between the patient/client and the professional. Boundaries are essential to keep both parties safe. The author outlines the various types of boundary violation that can arise in clinical practice, their consequences (both clinical and legal), how professionals can avoid them and how health care institutions might respond, should they occur. He concentrates on sexual boundary violations, because these have been the subject of most empirical study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyoung Yoon Chang ◽  
Ki Young Lim
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-228
Author(s):  
Richard M. Patel ◽  
Raquel Miller

Objective: This article reviews the issue of patients giving gifts to psychiatrists and mental health providers. Method: Anonymous survey of 100 academic psychiatrists measured prevalence of receiving gifts, type and estimated dollar value of gifts given, and psychiatrists’ reactions to gifts. Case vignettes illustrate clinical situations associated with gift giving and how failure to recognize motivation of gift giving may lead to situations requiring immediate intervention. Results: 71% of psychiatrists surveyed received (were offered & accepted) at least one gift in prior year (average 0.36 per month and 3.6 per year; $11.40 average [estimated] amount per gift). Group comparisons achieving at least a p < 0.05 significance: outpatient psychiatrists received gifts twice as often as inpatient, female and outpatient groups’ gifts were estimated as more expensive, a positive correlation was found between psychiatrists receiving gifts and psychiatrists giving a positive response to gifts, there was significantly more negative responses to high cost gifts (>$100) than to low cost (<$20), and outpatient psychiatrists reported interpreting gift’s meaning more often than inpatient. Conclusions: Psychiatrists are commonly offered and accept gifts from patients. Gifts communicate patient information and response to treatment. Although the act of gift giving sends important data to the receiving psychiatrist, including boundary violation issues, there are no agreed upon guidelines regarding how to respond. Future study should explore the meanings and appropriateness of a gift regarding type, cost, timing, frequency, intent, as well as how providers can respond to the gesture.


2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Gee ◽  
Anne Tonkin ◽  
Sharon Gaby ◽  
Veronika Urh ◽  
Sarah Anderson ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT A sexual boundary violation by a health practitioner has an immense impact on a patient, and the trust and confidence in the health care system and the health care regulator are negatively affected. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and the Medical Board of Australia (MBA) in 2017 commissioned an independent review in response to a specific high-profile case of multiple physician-patient* sexual boundary violations. In response to recommendations for process improvement, Ahpra and the MBA worked to transform the regulatory management of sexual boundary notifications.The purpose of this paper is to explore the structural and cultural changes that have been made to manage sexual boundary violation notifications and lessons learned through the process. Three factors — specialized decision-making, training for investigators and policy and cultural changes — were identified as key elements of the change process. Since the changes in 2017, the rate of immediate regulatory action taken in response to sexual boundary notifications has increased substantially, with a higher proportion of decisions resulting in suspension of a physician’s registration. Further work on the experience of those who are part of the notification process and supporting people to share their stories and experiences through the notification and tribunal process is ongoing.


2017 ◽  
pp. 185-194
Author(s):  
Rosie Gray ◽  
Tanya Garrett

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Peternelj-Taylor

The purpose of this article is to examine the phenomenon of whistleblowing as it relates to a reconstructed case study of an erotic boundary violation that emerged from a clinical situation in forensic psychiatric nursing practice. The unique features of this case are illustrated with the help of a model for decision making. Although the ramifications of exposing a colleague are many, it is argued that, in this particular case, it was morally and ethically the right thing to do.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document