Agricultural labourer suicides in a Kerala village

2021 ◽  
pp. 188-204
Author(s):  
P. Shihabudeen ◽  
Debosree Banerjee ◽  
Kshitija Joshi
Author(s):  
Jennifer Batt

This book explores the complex and contested relationships that existed between class, patronage, and poetry in Hanoverian England by examining the life and work of Stephen Duck, the ‘famous Threshing Poet’. In 1730, Duck became the most famous agricultural labourer in the nation when his writing won him the patronage of Queen Caroline. The man, and the writing he produced, intrigued contemporaries. How was it possible, they asked, for an agricultural labourer to become a poet? What would a thresher write? Did he really deserve royal patronage, and what would he do with such an honour? How should he be supported? And was he an isolated prodigy, or were there others like him, equally deserving of support? Duck’s remarkable story reveals the tolerances, and intolerances, of the Hanoverian social order. This book sheds new light on the poet’s early life, revealing how the farm labourer developed an interest in poetry; how he wrote his most famous poem, ‘The Thresher’s Labour’; how his public identity as the ‘famous Threshing Poet’ took shape; and how he came to be positioned as a figurehead of labouring-class writing. It explores how the patronage Duck received shaped his writing; how he came to reconceive his relationship with land, labour, and leisure; and how he made use of his newly acquired classical learning to develop new friendships and career opportunities. And it reveals how, after Duck’s death, rumours about his suicide came to overshadow the achievements of his life. Both in life, and in death, this book argues, Duck provided both opportunity and provocation for thinking through the complex interplay of class, patronage, and poetry in Hanoverian England.


Author(s):  
JK Saha ◽  
DC Acharjee ◽  
MM Rahman

The study was carried out to examine the socio-economic characteristics of tea plantation workers. A total of 50 farmers from Sylhet district were selected randomly for data collection. The study showed that on an average the size of family of the tea workers was 4.69 which is lower than agricultural labourer inBangladesh. The dependency ratio was found to be 1.80.The literacy of the teaworkers was 56 percent out of which 43 percent were primary level and 13 percent were secondary level. The average annual income per surveyed household was Tk. 75,615 out of which 83% of the total income came from service as a tea labourer while rest 17% derived from agriculture and non-agricultural sources. On an average, the annual expenditure per family was Tk 64,053.The study observed that 88 % percent of the surveyed family received loan from different NGO,s and while only 12 percent obtained from the bank. The analysis credit utilization showed that 41% of the total loan was utilized in meeting repairing houses followed by purchasing of cows (25%) and business (13%) respectively. The study showed that hundred percent roofs of tea workers houses were made of tin. But 58% of the wall was made of brick while 42% was made of mud. On an average 47% of the families reared poultry while 63 percent had livestock. Fifty four percent of households grew vegetables in the study area. The major types of vegetables cultivate by tea workers in the study area were bean, lalsak, chalkumra, gourd etc. Majority household had fruit trees in their homestead. The study showed that most of the household consumed their home products. But only twenty one percent of the households sold their fruits in the local market for cash flow.


2019 ◽  
pp. 173-186
Author(s):  
J. L. Hammond ◽  
Barbara Hammond

Author(s):  
Jennifer Batt

This chapter explores how Stephen Duck’s public identity as ‘the famous Threshing Poet’ was forged as much by what was written about him as it was by anything he wrote himself. In the weeks and months after Queen Caroline’s patronage was announced, the poetic abilities of the agricultural labourer were debated in pamphlets, newspaper articles, poems, essays, and even dramatic scenes. What did the emergence of such a poet mean for contemporary literary culture? Could a labourer really merit the extraordinary acclaim that Duck had received, or was his present fame a symptom of a worrying decline in standards? Was he an isolated and unique case, or just the most visible exemplar of a growing group of ambitious and talented labouring-class men and women? And if there were more labouring-class poets like him, was that prospect to be welcomed or feared? This chapter explores how Duck’s contemporaries sought to answer these questions. For some, the thresher poet was an ill-educated rustic whose startling rise to fame was symptomatic of a debased literary sphere; for others, though, Duck was an important figurehead of an emerging movement of labouring-class writing.


1908 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 722
Author(s):  
P. G. C. ◽  
W. Hasbach

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
G. K. Chesterton ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document