Environmental Criminology

2020 ◽  
pp. 273-293
Author(s):  
Anthony E. Bottoms ◽  
Paul Wiles
2021 ◽  
pp. 106984
Author(s):  
Asier Moneva ◽  
E. Rutger Leukfeldt ◽  
Steve G.A. Van De Weijer ◽  
Fernando Miró-Llinares

Author(s):  
Kimberly L. Barrett ◽  
Michael J. Lynch ◽  
Paul B. Stretesky

Author(s):  
Michael Townsley

This chapter outlines how theories of environmental criminology can inform our understanding of maritime piracy and assesses empirically how the incidence of maritime piracy is influenced by opportunities created by a maritime setting. The chapter is organized into three sections. The first section after the introduction discusses different periods of piracy, spanning ancient times, the Middle Ages, and up to present day. While the factors contributing to piracy in each age vary, there is a common explanation for how piracy has been quashed: establishing effective place management in the maritime realm. The second section focuses on some key constructs in environmental criminology and illustrates how they operate in a maritime setting. The concluding section deals with patterns that have been observed in maritime piracy in recent times.


Author(s):  
Ralph B. Taylor

This chapter discusses research and theorizing about the crime impacts of the physical environment, relating it to past reviews of scholarship in this area, and highlighting the crucial question of causality. It introduces key stumbling blocks in community criminology that must be addressed before scholarship can advance on the crucial causality question. Environmental criminology in a deep sense represents a field within a broader field of community criminology. The chapter underscores just a few of the most important recent works in four select areas within the physical environment-crime scholarship: space syntax, facilities and land use, accessibility/permeability, and crime prevention through environmental design/defensible space. The final section sketches one possible avenue for future research which can address these concerns.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-220
Author(s):  
Thomas Zawisza ◽  
Kelly Frailing

Research consistently demonstrates that offenders do not travel far to crime. Although this finding has been observed across different types of offending and offenders, one group rarely examined within this paradigm is offenders with mental illness (OWMI). We calculated the distance to crime for a group of offenders with a documented mental illness and compared that distance to those in other publications for other samples. We found that our sample of OWMI traveled about the same and in some cases shorter distances to crime than other offenders. Although this study has limitations, we believe it nevertheless lends support to the environmental criminology paradigm and provides important policy implications, as well as questions for further research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document