Report Writing II

Author(s):  
Jody Eberly ◽  
Arti Joshi
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. Beriloff ◽  
Rosemary Flanagan

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Hamdy Hady ◽  
Henderi Henderi ◽  
Dian Mustika Putri

The management activity of research report writing requires sufficient knowledge in its preparation. A researcher must learn about the management of understanding scientific concepts, as well as management of research reports that are based on scientific truth. In this study, 1 (one) method was used, namely a literature study of 10 (ten) to support the understanding of scientific concepts according to experts. The concept is a general idea that represents perceived understanding on the basis of reason and logic by someone who then forms a meaning deductively or inductively. Whereas knowledge is what is known or the results of work know. Then scientific truth is related to the quality of knowledge, where every knowledge possessed is viewed from the type of knowledge that is built. Thus scientific truth is an important point in scientific reporting, as the basic foundation of accurate management of report writing and must be displayed in every corner of the report. It is hoped that this research can assist researchers in compiling research reports. Keywords: Management, Science, Scientific Truth, Research Reports.


1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice Chinn ◽  
Phyllis Bolds ◽  
David Banaszak ◽  
Robert Merkle
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 60 (575) ◽  
pp. 2407-2414
Author(s):  
Takeshi Nakamoto ◽  
Katsumi Yamaguchi ◽  
Abraha Abbay ◽  
Yoshimoto Matsuda ◽  
Karyawan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Sheena Gardner

Abstract To complement earlier studies of writing development in the BAWE corpus of successful student writing (Nesi & Gardner 2012; Staples et al. 2016), we examine the Systemic Functional Linguistics notion of Theme as used by L2 writers across first- and third-year and in two distinctive discourse types: persuasive/argumentative Discursive writing of assignments in the soft disciplines and Experimental report writing of assignments in the hard sciences. Theme analysis reveals more substantial differences across the two discourse types than between first- and third-year L2 undergraduate writing. Textual Themes are consistently more frequent than interpersonal Themes, and some variance is found within subcategories of each. Significant differences in lexical density occur across third-year discourse types and between first- and third-year Experimental writing where a predominance of N+N topical Themes is also found. These findings are important as previous research has tended to focus on L1 Discursive writing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document