scholarly journals An Overview of an Invasive Fungal Infection In Covid-19: Mucormycosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Himan shu ◽  
◽  
Mukesh kumar ◽  

Mucormycosis is an invasive fungal infection of zygomycetes class, comprised the orders of entomophtherales and mucorales which is common infection in immuno compromised patients, especially in stem cell transplantation, hematological malignancy and diabetes mellitus. It is the third invasive fungal infection after aspergillosis and candidiasis both strain belong the class of zygomycetes. Mucormycosis generally transmitted in humans by the inoculation and inhalation of spores in mucous membrane as well as skin. After the deadly outbreak of corona virus, this infection has taken a different form in those patients who suffer from the covid-19 which is categorized as a post covid-19 disease. Aim of this review to highlight the recent awareness about invasive fungal treatment.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5710-5710
Author(s):  
Nieves Dorado ◽  
Gillen Oarbeascoa ◽  
Miguel Argüello ◽  
Pascual Balsalobre ◽  
David Serrano ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI) is a serious complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Its incidence and outcome are not well characterized in the setting of peripheral blood, non-manipulated haploidentical stem cell transplantation with postransplant cyclophosphamide (HaploSCT). The aim of the study is to analyze our experience among patients who underwent HaploSCT at our institution and developed an IFI, in order to identify the incidence, risk factors and its impact in survival. Materials and methods: One hundred and thirty-three patients underwent peripheral blood HaploSCT with postransplant cyclophosphamide at our institution between 2011 and 2017. IFI was classified according to the EORTC definitions. Proven and probable IFI were included. Results: Patients´ characteristics are shown in Table 1. Patients received primary antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin from the day before stem cell infusion, during admission and until neutrophil engraftment was stablished. Patients on steroid treatment due to GVHD received prophylaxis with micafungin or posaconazole. Twenty-three episodes of IFI were observed in 20 patients, 10 proven and 13 probable, with a cumulative incidence of IFI of 15% at 500 days. Most commonly isolated organism was Aspergillus spp (5 cases), followed by Candida spp (4 cases: 1 C. kruseii and 3 C. parapsilosis) and Fusarium spp (2 cases). Additionally we observed some isolated cases of Inonotus spp,Mucor spp and Trichosporon Ashii. Pulmonary involvement was the most frequent presentation (11 cases), followed by fungemia (5 cases, 4 Candida and 1 Trichosporon Ashii) and skin-pulmonary involvement (2 cases). Thirteen cases were diagnosed early, in the pre-engraftment period, 5 just after the engraftment and 5 cases developed later. Among patients with late occurrence of IFI, median time of IFI was 220 days, and all of them were associated with GVHD (3 grade III-IV acute GVHD and 2 moderate/severe chronic GVHD). IFI outcome was favorable in 14 out of the 23 documented IFI, with antifungal therapy. Treatment chosen was liposomal amphotericin B in 7 cases, voriconazole in 5 and combined treatment (with amphotericin B and azole) in 6. Death related to IFI was documented in 7 out of the 20 patients, with an IFI mortality cumulative incidence of 6.4%. Prior transplant (OR 4.5, p <0.01) and especially alloHSCT were associated to IFI development (OR 8.2, p <0.01). We did not find any other risk factor associated to IFI, like time of engraftment, disease, conditioning regimen, sequential regimen, grades II-IV GVHD or severe/moderate chronic GVHD. Conclusions: In our experience, cumulative incidence of IFI in the setting of HaploSCT was similar than the one observed in other studies with alloSCT. Mortality associated to IFI in the whole cohort was low (6.4 %). The most significant factor related to IFI development was having received a previous transplant, especially alloSCT. Therefore, this high risk population should be closely monitored and could benefit from prophylaxis with azoles. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 5004-5004
Author(s):  
Christine Wolschke ◽  
Heinrich Lellek ◽  
Marion Heinzelmann ◽  
Nicolaus Kroeger ◽  
Axel Zander

Abstract Background: Patients with haematogical diseases and undergoing stem cell or bone marrow transplantation are at high risk for an invasive fungal infection. The appearance and course of this is a significant threat to the overall success of transplantation. The optimal antifungal prophylaxis for stem cell transplanted patients has not yet been clearly etablished. Whereas oral medication seems to be convenient it is often hampered in the course of administration by mucositis or/and unclear absorption. We analysed the impact of antimycotic prophylaxis in our unit. We started with Voriconazol (tbl.) or Itraconazol (solution) followed by an early switch to liposomal amphotericin B with a dose 1 mg/kgBW, if the patients didn’t tolerate oral medications. Patients and methods: 48 patients (18f/30m) with a history of possible (n=4), probable (n=1) or proven (n=3) invasive fungal infection according to EORTC-MSG criteria or no (n=40) fungal infection underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation in our centre between 08/2005 and 05/2006. Mean age was 47 (6–67) and underlying disease was acute leukaemia (18 AML, 5 ALL, 3 NHL, 4 MM, 4 CML, 14 other). Transplants were unrelated in 38 and related in10 cases. Results: Prophylaxis started on average 6 days prior to transplant (mean 6, range 0–19) with ITZ (n=24), VOR (n=8) or LAMB (n=8). 8 pts. developed early signs of fungal infection precluding analysis within the prophylaxis population. 15/24 pts. on ITZ and 3/8 pts. on VOR needed a switch to i.v.-medication with LAMB. 3/24 pts. starting with ITZ developed a fungal infection (2 possible, 1 probable). Pts. starting with VOR or LAMB required empiric therapy in 1 and 4 cases, respectively. 12 pts. after switching to LAMB required no further antifungal-therapy. Conclusions: In our experience antifungal prophylaxis with oral medication being switched to LAMB in case of mucositis or side effects is an effective and tolerated option to prevent invasive fungal infection in patients during allogeneic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irit Avivi ◽  
Ilana Oren ◽  
Nuhad Haddad ◽  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
Eldad J. Dann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document