scholarly journals The Immediate And Intermediate Results Of Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty In Patients With Congenital Valvular Aortic Stenosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Hussein A. Alwahab
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Maximum Peak ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Valvular Aortic Stenosis

Background: Aortic valve stenosis results from minor to severe degrees of aortic valve maldevelopment. This stenosis causes mild to severe obstruction of the left ventricular outflow . Objectives : to study the immediate and intermediate results of percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with congenital valvular aortic stenosis . Type of the study: A prospective study. Methods: The study was done on thirty five patients with congenital valvular aortic stenosis who had percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty  in Ibn Al- Bitar Center for Cardiac Surgery from May 2009 to February 2011. Results: Twenty seven patients were male (77.2%) and 8 patients were female (22.8%), male to female ratio 3.5/ 1, . The aortic valve was bicuspid in 18 patients (51.4%) while 17 patients ( 48.6%) had tricuspid aortic valve. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty was successful in 30 patients (85.7%),. Maximum peak instantaneous Doppler pressure gradient across the aortic valve 24 hours postprocedural echocardiography showed reduction which is statistically significant. New aortic regurgitation had occurred in 15 patients ( 42.8%), it was mild in 9 patients ( 25.6%), moderate in 5 patients ( 14.3%) and severe in 1 patient( 2.9%) which is statistically significant. The follow up of 12.57 ± 3.88 ( 3- 22) months after intervention was done for all patients using echocardiography Doppler study, reveal the maximum peak instantaneous Doppler pressure gradient  across the aortic valve was raised  which is statistically significant. The aortic regurgitation was present in 18 patients (51.4%) , it was mild in 9 patients (25.7%) , moderate in 6 patients (17.1%) and severe in 3 patients  ( 8.6%). No mortality had been reported during the procedure or on follow up.                                                                                  Conclusion: Aortic balloon valvuloplasty is safe and effective procedure in the treatment of congenital valvular aortic stenosis but mild aortic regurgitation is the most common immediate complication of aortic balloon dilatation and progressive aortic regurgitation is a major problem during the intermediate follow up.                                                                                                                                               

Abstract 19440: Reintervention Rates Following Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty versus Surgical Valve Repair in Isolated Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis - A Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
May T Saung ◽  
Courtney McCracken ◽  
Ritu Sachdeva ◽  
Christopher J Petit
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Congenital Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Primary Indication ◽  
Aortic Valvuloplasty

Introduction: The optimal treatment for congenital aortic stenosis (AS) is debated despite decades of experience with both balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and surgical aortic valve repair (SAV). While BAV has been the mainstay of therapy for AS, recent single-center reports suggest optimal results following SAV. Hypothesis: We propose that reintervention rates following SAV and BAV are equivalent. Methods: We queried Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science for eligible studies using the keywords: “congenital aortic stenosis”, “balloon valvotomy”, “aortic valve stenosis surgery” and “treatment outcome or reintervention”. Studies were excluded when cohort size was <20 pts, when follow-up was < 2.5 yrs from primary intervention, and when primary indication was not AS (e.g. SAV in the setting of aortic valve regurgitation (AR)). Outcomes analyzed included death, reintervention and moderate or severe AR. Analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis v3 using random effects models. Results: A total of 20 studies were included in our meta-analysis: SAV alone (n=3), BAV alone (n=12), and both (n=5). The mean age at BAV was 3.1 years (range, 4 days - 7 years) with a mean follow-up duration of 6.8 years, while mean age at SAV was 2.8 years (range, 14.2 days - 7.1 years) with a mean follow-up duration of 9.1 years. Mortality rates following BAV and SAV were 12.3% (95% CI: 7.7 - 19.1) and 10.2% (95% CI: 7.0 - 14.5), respectively (p=0.27). Reintervention following initial procedure for treatment of AS was higher following BAV (35.7% [95% CI: 29 - 43.1]) compared to SAV (25.2% [95% CI: 19.9 - 31.3])(p=0.012). Long-term and mid-term follow-up in these studies showed moderate to severe AR was present in 24.1% and 28.1% of BAV and SAV patients, respectively. Conclusions: Notwithstanding publication bias, both survival rates and development of late AR following BAV and SAV are similar. However, reintervention rates are significantly higher following BAV compared to SAV.

scholarly journals Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty (Pbav) in a Child With Congenital Severe Aortic Stenosis –A Case Report

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-236
Author(s):  
AQM Reza ◽  
MSR Patwary ◽  
A Baqui
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Valve Area

A 8 years old boy presented with shortness of breath, cough and palpitation and subsequently diagnosed as a case of severe aortic stenosis with bicuspid aortic valve. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) was done and he became asymptomatic. Post procedure his aortic valve area and aortic systolic pressure increased, transaortic pressure gradient decreased. So good result, lower cost, elimination of drawbacks of thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass suggest in children percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty should be the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Key Words: Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty, Severe aortic stenosis, Bicuspid aortic valve DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v1i2.8241 Cardiovasc. j. 2009; 1(2): 234-236

scholarly journals 1161 Baseline echocardiographic parameters associated with reintervention in children with aortic valve stenosis following balloon aortic valvuloplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Papneja ◽  
Z Blatman ◽  
I D Kawpeng ◽  
J Wheatley ◽  
H Osce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Circumferential Strain ◽  
Ventricular Outflow Tract ◽  
Aortic Insufficiency ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Aortic valve (AV) stenosis is the most common type of congenital left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Short-term outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) including residual aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and procedural complications have been established. The impact of pre-intervention AV characteristics on long-term outcomes has not been well studied. Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the initial parameters on baseline echocardiogram and the time to reintervention in children with AV stenosis following BAV. Methods Children from the newborn period to 18 years of age with AV stenosis who underwent BAV from 2004-2012 were included. Patients with aortic insufficiency prior to BAV, complex congenital heart lesions, or less than two accessible follow-up echocardiograms were excluded. Baseline and serial echocardiographic data pertaining to aortic valve and LV size and function was retrospectively collected until December 2017 or until the first reintervention. Time to reintervention or death was evaluated. Results Among the 98 enrolled patients, the median [IQR] age at BAV was 2.8 months [0.2-75]. The median [IQR] duration of follow-up was 6.8 [1.9-9.0] years. Eighty-nine (83%) patients had bicuspid valve morphology and the median [IQR] peak-to-peak catheterization gradient prior to BAV was 49 [34-65] mmHg. The cumulative proportion [95% CI] of reintervention at 5 years following BAV was 33.7% [23.6%, 42.4%]. Primary indications for reintervention were aortic stenosis (57%), aortic insufficiency (14%), or mixed valve disease (30%). Reinterventions included repeat BAV (49%), AV repair (15%), and AV replacement (36%). Increased LVEF at baseline as well as increased mean LV circumferential strain at baseline were associated with decreased risk of reintervention (HR [95% CI] (1 unit increments): 0.974 [0.959-0.989], p &lt; 0.001; 0.939 [0.884-0.997], p = 0.041 respectively). Increased AV annulus z-score was also associated with decreased risk of reintervention (HR [95% CI] (1 unit increments): 0.806 [0.698-0.93], p = 0.003). Conclusions Our results demonstrate that better left ventricular function at baseline, measured by LVEF and mean LV circumferential strain, is associated with a decreased risk of reintervention in neonates and children following BAV. We have also shown that a bigger AV annulus prior to BAV is associated with a decreased risk of reintervention.

BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY WITH VALVER BALLOON CATHETER IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS AS A BRIDGE OR PALLIATIVE TREATMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1622-1627
Author(s):  
Jacek Bil ◽  
Paweł Modzelewski ◽  
Agnieszka Pawlak ◽  
Robert J Gil
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Palliative Treatment ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Balloon Catheters ◽  
Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
The Mean

The aim: We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of performing balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) with Valver balloon catheter (Balton, Poland) in adults with severe aortic stenosis as a bridge or palliative treatment. Materials and methods: We identified consecutive patients who underwent BAV procedures between May 2019 and March 2020 using Valver balloon catheters. Demographic data, medical history, and clinical characteristics were retrospectively collected in all study patients together with periprocedural data as well as 12-month follow-up data. Results: We included 18 patients. The mean population age was 78.1±8.9 years, and women were 61.1%. The most common co-morbidities were arterial hypertension (88.9%), dyslipidemia (83.3%), and coronary artery disease (72.2%). The baseline mean aortic valve pressure gradient was 49.94±27.02 mmHg and the mean aortic valve area (AVA) was 0.65±0.20 cm2. In all cases, the procedure was performed from the femoral access via the 8F sheath. Two Valver balloon catheter sizes were used 18x40mm (33.3%) and 20x40mm (66.7%). Three periprocedural complications were observed, and none was associated with the Valver balloon catheter per se. The transthoracic echocardiography after the procedure revealed a decrease in the mean pressure gradient of 11.1±8.85 mmHg, and an increase in AVA of 0.21±0.19 cm2. At 12-month follow-up, the mortality rate was 38.9%. Conclusions: BAV is a procedure increasingly performed in catheterization laboratories worldwide. This paper confirmed the relative safety of BAV with Valver balloon catheters in the modern era, showing a low incidence of valve and vascular complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document