scholarly journals English Language Teaching in Turkey in the 1960s: Plus ça change…?

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-222
Author(s):  
Ali Fuad SELVİ
2020 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 461
Author(s):  
Leigh McDowell

Error Analysis (EA) was initially conceived in early Second Language Acquisition research in the 1960s to investigate the systems underlying learner language and has since gained wider application in English Language Teaching research. However, for many language teachers, the practical and technological barriers to employing EA in their professional practices remain restrictively high. This paper demonstrates a simple yet robust procedure for EA that can be applied by anyone with access to the commonly available tools of Microsoft Word and Excel. Additionally, by drawing on data from an EA of 18 texts written by Japanese materials scientists, the paper illustrates how this procedure can inform language teaching practices by identifying the most pressing grammatical needs within a population of L2 English users. 本来、誤答分析(Error Analysis)は、語学学習者の言語の根本にあるシステムを調査する為に1960年代の初期第二言語習得(SLA)研究中に提案されていて、その後英語教授法(ELT)研究に広く使われるようになった。しかし、多くの語学教師等にとっては、仕事に誤答分析を用いるには技術的な壁が未だに高い。本論文では、一般的に使われているワードやエクセル等によって簡単で確実に誤答分析が出来る方法を紹介する。また、18名の日本人の材料科学研究者の文章の誤答分析のデータを用いて、どのようにしてこの方法を使って言語教育法を明確に出来るかを、第二言語として英語を話すグループの課題となる文法の必要性を示しながら、を説明する。


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Royani ◽  
T. Silvana Sinar

This study investigated the English students’ attitudes of IAIN Padangsidimpuan towards both English language teaching in terms of (a) language-centered, (b) learner-centered, and (c) learning-centered method; and learning English in terms of scales (a) attitudes toward long-term English learning, (b) interest in culture and communication, (c) perception about studying in school context, (d) images associated with English, (e) English learning activities, (f) exposure to English outside school, (g) self-rated four English skills, (h) self-reported academic English grade, and (i) identification of English role models. The data were obtained by questionnaire and interview from 10 selected students in which 4 male and 6 female students in 7th semester and were analyzed by steps provided by Gay, L.R and Airasian (1996). The result showed:  first, English students’ attitudes towards English language teaching had been found highly onlearning-centered method, followed by learner-centered method in second range, and almost negative view in language-centered method.Second, English students’ attitudes towards English language learningwere positivein scales; long-term English learning, interest in communication, and images associated with English.  Third, role of students’ gender on English language learning were not found. Reasons for this statement are (i) status of English as international language and (ii) equalization of getting education for male and female. Keywords: attitude, language teaching, language learning, and gender


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document