Safety Analysis of Laryngeal Mask Ventilation in Clinical Anesthesia of Obstetrics and Gynecology

2021 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian G. Russo ◽  
Christoph Stradtmann ◽  
Thomas A. Crozier ◽  
Christiane Ringer ◽  
Hans-Joachim Helms ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 638-642
Author(s):  
SHAFAQ AHMED ◽  
SARFRAZ JANJUA

Objective: To highlight the problems and solutions in airways management in patients with tracheal stenosis undergoing surgical interventions and to highlight the alternative methods of airway control where high frequency ventilatory facility is not available. Study Design: Case series study. Place and Duration: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi from 1st Jan 2004 to 30th June 2007. Patients and Methods: Twenty nine patients of both sex and all age groups presenting with difficulty in breathing due to tracheal stenosis undergoing surgical intervention on trachea have been included. All the patients were managed under general anaesthesia. Nasogastric tube 10 Fr, suction catheter, laryngeal mask airway or mask ventilation was used for initial ventilation where conventional endotracheal tube of even smallest size did not work. Results: Small size endotracheal tube were used in twenty four patients. Difficulty was faced in five patients. In these patients endotracheal tube of smallest size available could not be passed and we had to provide ventilation by innovative measures like nasogastric tube 10Fr in one, suction catheter 10Fr in two, laryngeal mask airway in one and mask ventilation in one. There was no mortality. Conclusions: Adequate ventilation during tracheal stenosis surgery can be very difficult in some cases. Therefore a thorough understanding, a tier of flexible plans and a variety of ventilating means should be arranged before administering anaesthesia.Nasogastric tube 10Fr or suction catheter of similar size are suitable alternative if facility for high frequency ventilation is not available.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon S Craig ◽  
Marc Auerbach ◽  
John Alexander Cheek ◽  
Franz E Babl ◽  
Ed Oakley ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo describe senior paediatric emergency clinician perspectives on the optimal frequency of and preferred modalities for practising critical paediatric procedures.MethodsMulticentre multicountry cross-sectional survey of senior paediatric emergency clinicians working in 96 EDs affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Research Network.Results1332/2446 (54%) clinicians provided information on suggested frequency of practice and preferred learning modalities for 18 critical procedures. Yearly practice was recommended for six procedures (bag valve mask ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway insertion, defibrillation/direct current (DC) cardioversion and intraosseous needle insertion) by at least 80% of respondents. 16 procedures were recommended for yearly practice by at least 50% of respondents. Two procedures (venous cutdown and ED thoracotomy) had yearly practice recommended by <40% of respondents. Simulation was the preferred learning modality for CPR, bag valve mask ventilation, DC cardioversion and transcutaneous pacing. Practice in alternative clinical settings (eg, the operating room) was the preferred learning modality for endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask insertion. Use of models/mannequins for isolated procedural training was the preferred learning modality for all other invasive procedures. Free-text responses suggested the utility of cadaver labs and animal labs for more invasive procedures (thoracotomy, intercostal catheter insertion, open surgical airways, venous cutdown and pericardiocentesis).ConclusionsPaediatric ED clinicians suggest that most paediatric critical procedures should be practised at least annually. The preferred learning modality depends on the skill practised; alternative clinical settings are thought to be most useful for standard airway manoeuvres, while simulation-based experiential learning is applicable for most other procedures.


BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. e010770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gereon Schälte ◽  
Lilli-Theresa Bomhard ◽  
Rolf Rossaint ◽  
Mark Coburn ◽  
Christian Stoppe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document