scholarly journals LEARNER SECURITY & PRIVACY RISKS: HOW USAGE OF ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA OUTSIDE A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AFFECTS LEARNERS? DIGITAL IDENTITY

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
Digital Identity ◽  
Online Social Media ◽  
Learning Management ◽  
Privacy Risks

scholarly journals A Development Framework for Social Media Interaction in Learning Management System

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.13) ◽  
pp. 301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalaivani Ravisekaran ◽  
Sivakumar Ramakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Ubiquitous Learning ◽  
Learning Condition ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Media Interaction ◽  
Learning Management

Learning Management System (LMS) plays a vital role and an imprortant part in technology-enhanced learning. It presents different services to enhance the education procedure in ubiquitous learning condition. But, it is found that in existing education MS a extend range of education procedure and process are presented. But, it needs to be developed with some ubiquitous additional functionality. So the current research we proposed a struture for LMS to integrate social media services to make the LMS enrich in ubiquitous condition. This structure approves efficient social and intellectual interaction between users in ubiquitous Learning Management System environment. 

Facebook and the Societal Aspects of Formal Learning

2015 ◽  
pp. 1345-1367
Author(s):  
Carolyn Woodley ◽  
Petrina Dorrington
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
Student Support ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Formal Learning ◽  
Cooperative Group ◽  
Collaborative Spaces ◽  
Learning Management ◽  
Critical Consideration

An online subject used social media to provide “collaborative spaces” that were “additional and complementary” to discussion in the university's Learning Management System (LMS). Facebook and Twitter provided optional “informal spaces” in which students “talk about general issues to do with media and connect with other students in the unit.” This chapter's analysis of Facebook posts shows a cooperative group of peers providing advice on assessment and recommending useful resources. Analysis, however, reveals that, as well as supportive posts, a proportion of posts could be considered inappropriate, distracting, or even, infrequently, inflammatory. Guidelines about acceptable behaviour must be imposed by teaching staff. More importantly, optional participation in social media sites requires critical consideration. If Facebook is used as a student support space for an online subject, it should be integrated into the curriculum and have an explicit purpose; making social media sites optional alongside mandatory university-supported platforms can prove problematic.

Facebook and the Societal Aspects of Formal Learning

2014 ◽  
pp. 269-291
Author(s):  
Carolyn Woodley ◽  
Petrina Dorrington
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
Student Support ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Formal Learning ◽  
Cooperative Group ◽  
Collaborative Spaces ◽  
Learning Management ◽  
Critical Consideration

An online subject used social media to provide “collaborative spaces” that were “additional and complementary” to discussion in the university’s Learning Management System (LMS). Facebook and Twitter provided optional “informal spaces” in which students “talk about general issues to do with media and connect with other students in the unit.” This chapter’s analysis of Facebook posts shows a cooperative group of peers providing advice on assessment and recommending useful resources. Analysis, however, reveals that, as well as supportive posts, a proportion of posts could be considered inappropriate, distracting, or even, infrequently, inflammatory. Guidelines about acceptable behaviour must be imposed by teaching staff. More importantly, optional participation in social media sites requires critical consideration. If Facebook is used as a student support space for an online subject, it should be integrated into the curriculum and have an explicit purpose; making social media sites optional alongside mandatory university-supported platforms can prove problematic.

EXPLORING STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF USING THE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND SOCIAL MEDIA FOR BLENDED LEARNING AT A RURAL UNIVERSITY

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Moodley ◽  
R J Singh ◽  
J Cloete
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Education Reform ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Learning Management ◽  
Face To Face Learning ◽  
Networking Technologies

Blended learning combines the strength of face-to-face learning with e-learning, which has become the catalyst for education reform today. Unfortunately there are many obstacles that can derail this format of hybrid learning before it can reach its full potential, especially at universities where budgetary constraints inhibit the development of the information and communication infrastructure. This study seeks to capture students’ perceptions regarding web-based activities at a rural university. Purposive sampling was used to generate the sample and a combined total of 380 second- and third-year students participated in this study. Second- and third-year students were selected as it is expected that they have experienced the university learning management system and its shortcomings, and are hence in a posistion to compare the learning management system with social media platforms. The data collection instrument was a self-administered questionnaire, which was analysed using quantitative and qualitative methods. The findings indicate that students at the rural university preferred to engage in blended learning through social networking technologies, as opposed to the learning management system, which they found was mostly unavailable or inaccessible at their residences. 

Facebook and the Societal Aspects of Formal Learning

2014 ◽  
pp. 1305-1326
Author(s):  
Carolyn Woodley ◽  
Petrina Dorrington
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
Student Support ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Formal Learning ◽  
Cooperative Group ◽  
Collaborative Spaces ◽  
Learning Management ◽  
Critical Consideration

An online subject used social media to provide “collaborative spaces” that were “additional and complementary” to discussion in the university's Learning Management System (LMS). Facebook and Twitter provided optional “informal spaces” in which students “talk about general issues to do with media and connect with other students in the unit.” This chapter's analysis of Facebook posts shows a cooperative group of peers providing advice on assessment and recommending useful resources. Analysis, however, reveals that, as well as supportive posts, a proportion of posts could be considered inappropriate, distracting, or even, infrequently, inflammatory. Guidelines about acceptable behaviour must be imposed by teaching staff. More importantly, optional participation in social media sites requires critical consideration. If Facebook is used as a student support space for an online subject, it should be integrated into the curriculum and have an explicit purpose; making social media sites optional alongside mandatory university-supported platforms can prove problematic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document