scholarly journals An Effect of Mind Wandering on Human Foraging Behavior

Author(s):  
Ryuta Iseki
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Wilke ◽  
Benjamin Scheibehenne ◽  
Rui Mata ◽  
Peter M. Todd ◽  
H. Clark Barrett

2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M. Wolfe ◽  
Matthew S. Cain ◽  
Abla Alaoui-Soce

2015 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxia Zhang ◽  
Xue Gong ◽  
Daryl Fougnie ◽  
Jeremy M. Wolfe

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Goldstone ◽  
Benjamin C. Ashpole

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Wilke ◽  
John M. C. Hutchinson ◽  
Peter M. Todd ◽  
Uwe Czienskowski

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula Pool

AbstractCommonly used measures of human food insecurity differ categorically from measures determining food security in other species. In addition, human foraging behaviors may have arisen in a divergent evolutionary context from nonhuman foraging. Hence, a theoretical framework based on food insecurity and fat storage in nonhumans may not be appropriate for explaining associations between human food insecurity and obesity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrthe Faber

Abstract Gilead et al. state that abstraction supports mental travel, and that mental travel critically relies on abstraction. I propose an important addition to this theoretical framework, namely that mental travel might also support abstraction. Specifically, I argue that spontaneous mental travel (mind wandering), much like data augmentation in machine learning, provides variability in mental content and context necessary for abstraction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 878-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Marcusson-Clavertz ◽  
Oscar N. E. Kjell

Abstract. Thinking about task-unrelated matters (mind wandering) is related to cognition and well-being. However, the relations between mind wandering and other psychological variables may depend on whether the former commence spontaneously or deliberately. The current two studies investigated the psychometric properties of the Spontaneous and Deliberate Mind Wandering Scales (SDMWS; Carriere, Seli, & Smilek, 2013 ). Study 1 evaluated the stability of the scales over 2 weeks ( N = 284 at Time 1), whereas Study 2 ( N = 323) evaluated their relations to Generalized anxiety disorder symptoms, Openness, Social desirability, and experience-sampling reports of intentional and unintentional mind wandering during an online cognitive task. The results indicated that the SDMWS were better fitted with a two-factor than a one-factor solution, although the fit was improved with the exclusion of one item. The scales exhibited strong measurement invariance across gender and time, and moderately high test-retest reliability. Spontaneous mind wandering predicted Generalized anxiety disorder and experience-sampling reports of unintentional mind wandering, whereas Deliberate mind wandering predicted Openness and experience-sampling reports of intentional mind wandering. Furthermore, Spontaneous mind wandering showed a negative association with social desirability of weak-to-medium strength. In sum, the scales generally showed favorable psychometric properties.


Ecography ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Clark ◽  
Thomas G. Wolcott ◽  
Donna L. Wolcott ◽  
Anson H. Hines

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document