Chapter-07 Evolution of Modern Cataract-Intraocular Lens Surgery: A Historical Perspective on Surgical Techniques and Lens Designs/Biomaterials

2005 ◽  
pp. 58-70
Author(s):  
Suresh Pandey
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 446-455
Author(s):  
Linda Civerchia Balent ◽  
Kalpana Narendrum ◽  
Surekha Patel ◽  
Sumit Kar ◽  
David A Patterson

Drops of lens nucleus/cortex particles into the vitreous cavity or dislocations of intraocular lenses (IOLs) are one of the serious complications of cataract surgery with an increasing relative frequency with the increase in the number of cataract surgeries. In addition, spontaneous and traumatic dislocations are other common case groups that should be treated. In this article, the vitreous dislocations of nucleus/cortex residues or IOL dislocations are discussed with different vitreoretinal surgical techniques.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1454-1462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Böhm ◽  
Eva Hemkeppler ◽  
Michael Herzog ◽  
Sabrina Schönbrunn ◽  
Nina de’Lorenzo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanxiu Sun ◽  
Maximilian Hammer ◽  
Timur M. Yildirim ◽  
Ramin Khoramnia ◽  
Gerd U. Auffarth

AbstractAn Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and high-mesopic = 4 lx) for anterior iris-claw IOL fixation for correcting myopia or hyperopia (IFPH), retropupillary iris-claw IOL fixation to correct aphakia or as treatment for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation/subluxation (IFRP), and capsular-fixation IOL in-the-bag implantation (IB). Pupil size was measured preoperatively for the IFPH- and IB-group as well as 6 months after surgery for all groups. We analyzed a total of 70 eyes: 22 eyes of 11 patients with phakic IOLs, 22 eyes of 20 patients in the IFRP group and 26 eyes of 13 patients in the IB group. Both IFPH and IB showed a smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size, compared with the preoperative values. When compared to postoperative values of IB and IFPH, IFRP showed a significantly smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size (IFPH: 5.89 ± 0.83 mm, IFRP: 4.37 ± 0.83 mm, IB: 5.34 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.001) while no differences were seen at high-mesopic lighting. Neither of the surgical techniques seems to impair the constriction of the pupil.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document