Case Report of Patient with Osteoporosis who Sustained Rotational Deformity of Femoral Head-Neck Fragment after Treatment for Femoral Trochanteric Fracture with Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN).

Background: The incidence of inter trochanteric fracture is expected to have doubled by 2040. Inter trochanteric fractures account for about 45% to 50% of all hip fractures in the elderly populationand out of these, near about 50% to 60% are classified as unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure. This study as performed to assess functional outcome with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture management.Methods: It was prospective observational study done for a period of 1year from January 2016-January 2017 among patients who attended OPD or emergency department with intertrochanteric fracture. Two different implants were used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN).Results: Excellent results in functional outcome was more in case of PFN (66.6%) compared to DHS (50%). The type of trauma in DHS group was road traffic accident in 38.8%, domestic fall in 50% and others such as assault was in 11.1% while in PFN group intertrochanteric fracture was seen in 61.1% due to domestic fall.Conclusions: The functional outcome was more better with proximal femoral nail (PFN) compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS). Therefore, proximal femoral nail (PFN) should be preferred for management of intertrochanteric fractures.

Download Full-text

A Prospective Randomized Control Trial Comparing Proximal Femoral Nail and Sliding Hip Screw in The Management of Trochanteric Fracture of The Femur

Health Renaissance ◽

10.3126/hren.v9i1.4354 ◽

1970 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 7-11

Author(s):

NK Kam ◽

Ashis Jain ◽

P Nepal ◽

Mahi Pal Singh ◽

N Das

Keyword(s):

Controlled Trial ◽

Trochanteric Fracture ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Joint Disease ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Sliding Hip Screw ◽

Femoral Nail ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Screw Group

Introduction: There are various implants designed for fixation of trochanteric fracture which can be extramedullary (Sliding hip screw) and intramedullary (Proximal Femoral Nail). A randomized controlled trial comparing these techniques was conducted at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. Objective: To compare efficacy of proximal femoral nail and sliding hip screw in the management of trochanteric fractures. Methods: Patients in both groups were matched for age (mean 67 years, 50 to 100) and gender. We excluded all pathological fractures, patients presenting at more than one week, multiple fractures or any bone and joint disease interfering with rehabilitation. Results: The amount of blood loss and length of incision were significantly higher in the sliding hip screw group (p < 0.05). The time of union, range of movement and Western Ontario and McMasterUniversity knee scores were comparable at two years. The mean Harris hip score was better in proximal femoral group. Conclusion: The number of patients showing shortening, external malrotation and varus angulation was more in sliding hip screw group. There was one case of wound infection and a single case of breakage of implant in sliding hip screw group. Keywords: fracture trochanter; proximal femoral nail; sliding hip screw DOI: 10.3126/hren.v9i1.4354Health Renaissance, 2011: Vol.9 No.1:7-11

Download Full-text