scholarly journals COVID-19, Gangs, and Conflict. Edited by John P. Sullivan and Robert J. Bunker. McLean, VA: Small Wars Foundation, 2020. ISBN: 978-1-6641-2434-9. 200 pages. $3.99 (e-book), $44.99 (paperback).

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-125
Author(s):  
Gus Frias
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mordechai Bar-On
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Sibylle Scheipers

Clausewitz was an ardent analyst of partisan warfare. In 1810 and 1811, he lectured at the Berlin Kriegsschule, the war academy, on the subject of small wars. Clausewitz’s lectures focused on the tactical nature of small wars. However, the eighteenth-century context was by no means irrelevant for Clausewitz’s further intellectual development. On the contrary, he extrapolated from his analysis of the tactical nature of small wars their strategic potential, as well as their exemplary nature for the study of war as such. The partisan, in Clausewitz’s eyes, possessed exemplary qualities in that he acted autonomously and, in doing so, had to draw upon all his human faculties. As such, he was the paradigmatic antagonist to the regular soldier who displayed a ‘cog mentality’ fostered by the Frederickian military system.


1920 ◽  
Vol 65 (458) ◽  
pp. 310-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Borton
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Stanislav Malkin

The Interbellum era was marked by the competition of various interpretations of guerrilla warfare and small wars, which were a practical expression of rebel activity in the colonies and on the outskirts of the British Empire. Discussions in that regard reflected both theoretical and doctrinal contradictions and the bureaucratic rivalry between the departments responsible for its internal security and the confrontation between the military and civilian authorities over the boundaries of their responsibility to preserve colonial order. The evolution of the meaning of the concept of “guerilla warfare” within the British military thought in the first half of the 20th century is demonstrated by highlighting the stages of the process, historical reconstruction of the levels of discussion of this topic in a professional environment, and identifying the degree of mutual influence of its basic provisions in the face of budgetary constraints and new challenges to colonial rule after the First World War. This approach allowed to specify ideas about the place and role of the army in the functioning of the internal security system of the British Empire at the final stage of its existence. The analysis of the semantics and content of the “guerilla warfare” concept between two world wars makes it possible to apply a new approach to the issue of disagreements between the military and civilian authorities over the choice of the military and political course in the conflicts of this kind. Thus, the identified differences may be viewed as a result not of the bureaucratic differences only, but as the absence of the unified understanding of the “modern rebellion” problem among the military as itself.


2017 ◽  
pp. 50-99
Author(s):  
Walter Laqueur
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document