scholarly journals What children on the autism spectrum have to ‘say’ about using high‐tech voice output communication aids (VOCAs) in an educational setting

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Checkley ◽  
Nick Hodge ◽  
Sue Chantler ◽  
Lisa Reidy ◽  
Katie Holmes
Author(s):  
Paul A. Offit ◽  
Anne Snow ◽  
Thomas Fernandez ◽  
Laurie Cardona ◽  
Elena L. Grigorenko ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Kannenberg ◽  
Thomas P. Marquardt ◽  
Jayne Larson

2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pat Mirenda

Many individuals with autism are candidates for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, either to supplement (i.e., augment) their existing speech or to act as their primary (i.e., alternative) method of expressive communication. The purpose of this article is to summarize research and directions for future research with regard to two questions related to the delivery of AAC supports to these individuals: (a) What AAC modality is preferable to use? and (b) What do we know about the use of voice output communication aids with people with autism?


2020 ◽  
pp. 83-107
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Fein

Drawing on school-based ethnography in classrooms serving students with Asperger’s syndrome and related autism spectrum conditions in a district on the East Coast of the United States, this chapter analyzes how the meanings of these conditions are defined, negotiated, and deployed in consequential ways in contexts of everyday practice. The chapter begins by tracing schisms between “developmental disability” and “mental illness.” Through what Ian Hacking calls a “looping effect of human kinds,” students diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome and related developmental disabilities come to exemplify a form of “brainhood,” a cerebral identity associated with replicable, quantified, and high-tech brain science. This schema is contrasted with local understandings of students classified with emotional or behavioral disturbance as changeable, morally culpable, and interpersonally engaged—thus exemplifying theories of mental illness as rooted in fluid brain chemistry and family dysfunction. The association of students with Asperger’s syndrome with a brain science seen as value-producing, mechanistic, and estranged from sociality wins them both a protected space and scarce material resources; however, this vision of Asperger’s students as “innocent machines” cannot effectively conceptualize the moral agency of their robustly social lives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document