scholarly journals Prognostic role of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1397-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Jonas ◽  
Marcin Waligóra ◽  
Wojciech Magoń ◽  
Tomasz Zdrojewski ◽  
Jakub Stokwiszewski ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1286-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vallerie V. McLaughlin ◽  
Jean-Luc Vachiery ◽  
Ronald J. Oudiz ◽  
Stephan Rosenkranz ◽  
Nazzareno Galiè ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P309-P309
Author(s):  
A. C. Charalampopoulos ◽  
I. Tzoulaki ◽  
L. S. Howard ◽  
R. Davies ◽  
W. Gin-Sing ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Charalampopoulos ◽  
Luke S. Howard ◽  
Ioanna Tzoulaki ◽  
Wendy Gin-Sing ◽  
Julia Grapsa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Stubbe ◽  
Hans-Jürgen Seyfarth ◽  
Janina Kleymann ◽  
Michael Halank ◽  
Hussam Al Ghorani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although combination therapy is the gold standard for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), some of these patients are still being treated with monotherapy. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis at four German PH centres to describe the prevalence and characteristics of patients receiving monotherapy. Results We identified 131 incident PAH patients, with a mean age of 64 ± 13.8 years and a varying prevalence of comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors and targeted therapy. As in other studies, the extent of prescribed PAH therapy varied with age and coexisting diseases, and younger, so-called “typical” PAH patients were more commonly treated early with combination therapy (48% at 4–8 months). In contrast, patients with multiple comorbidities or cardiovascular risk factors were more often treated with monotherapy (69% at 4–8 months). Survival at 12 months was not significantly associated with the number of PAH drugs used (single, dual, triple therapy) and was not different between “atypical” and “typical” PAH patients (89% vs. 85%). Conclusion Although “atypical” PAH patients with comorbidities or a more advanced age are less aggressively treated with respect to combination therapy, the outcome of monotherapy in these patients appears to be comparable to that of dual or triple therapy in “typical” PAH patients.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
pp. 805A
Author(s):  
Jose G. Gomez-Arroyo ◽  
Juan P. Sandoval-Jones ◽  
Paulina Ramirez-Neria ◽  
Armando Rodriguez ◽  
Carla Murillo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Zuffa ◽  
F Dardi ◽  
M Palazzini ◽  
E Gotti ◽  
A Rinaldi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Current pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines stratify the risk of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) using a multiparametric approach. Anyway, the role of unmodifiable risk factors is not taken into account. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of unmodifiable risk factors (age, gender, PAH aetiology) in PAH risk stratification using the recently proposed simplified risk table and to test if these factors influence the response to PAH-specific treatment. Methods All patients with PAH referred to a single centre were included from 2003 to 2017. We applied a simplified risk assessment strategy using the following criteria: WHO functional class, 6-min walking distance, right atrial pressure or brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels and cardiac index (CI) or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2). The last 2 criteria were based on which parameter was available; if both were available the worst was chosen. Risk strata were defined as: Low risk= at least 3 low risk and no high-risk criteria; High risk= at least 2 high risk criteria including CI or SvO2; Intermediate risk= definitions of low or high risk not fulfilled. Then we performed multivariate Cox analysis to evaluate what are the independent predictors of survival (age, gender, PAH aetiology together with the recently proposed simplified PAH risk table) and we tested if these factors influence the response to PAH specific therapy comparing the % improvement of hemodynamic parameters from baseline to 3–4 months after starting treatment. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used for comparisons. Results Six hundreds and twenty-one treatment-naïve patients were enrolled. Age [HR (95% CI) = 1.022 (1.014–1.030); p-value <0.001], male gender [HR (95% CI) = 1.881 (1.479–2.392); p-value <0.001] and connective tissue disease (CTD)-PAH aetiology [HR (95% CI)= 2.278 (1.733–2.995); p-value <0.001] were all independent predictors of prognosis in patients with PAH together with the recently validated simplified PAH risk table [HR (95% CI) = 2.161 (1.783–2.618); p-value <0.001] but they didn't significantly influence the response to PAH specific treatment as shown in the Figure. Figure 1 Conclusions Age, gender and CTD-PAH aetiology significantly influence prognosis together with the recently validated simplified PAH risk table but don't significantly influence the response to PAH-specific treatment. Acknowledgement/Funding None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document